One Article Review

Accueil - L'article:
Source AlienVault.webp AlienVault Blog
Identifiant 1147557
Date de publication 2019-06-10 13:00:00 (vue: 2019-06-10 16:00:24)
Titre Vulnerability scanning – in house or third party?
Texte vulnerability scanning - is it better to do in house or by consultant You can’t fix the flaws you don’t know about – and the clearer your sense of your organization’s overall security posture, the better equipped you are to improve it. Vulnerability assessments are a core requirement for IT security, and conducting them on a regular basis can help you stay one step ahead of the bad guys. Ultimately, a vulnerability assessment helps you shift from a reactive cybersecurity approach to a proactive one, with an increased awareness of the cyber risks your organization faces and an ability to prioritize the flaws that need the most attention. With a diagnosis of your digital health, vulnerability scanning can provide a digital footprint and a precise picture of the threat landscape by applying a grade to each vulnerability to help your IT team prioritize and create risk treatment plans by focusing on the biggest opportunities first. Any company can be exposed to the exploitation of their vulnerabilities; no one can claim to be 100% protected. But, without insight into those vulnerabilities and their effect on your organization’s business operations, remediation plans can’t be put into motion. While conducting your own vulnerability scanning in-house may be attractive for companies, it’s hard to beat the expertise of a third party security provider. For some organizations, it may be more effective to keep all testing in house due to the understanding of the detailed environment and systems being accessed. On the other hand, for most small- and medium-sized businesses, it is difficult to maintain the level of expertise in-house that a third party provider can offer. Requirements to properly assess vulnerability scanning results will depend on the company and its mission, and the requisite technical skills and work experience may be hard to come by. An in-house security assessment team may lack specialization, and it’s almost impossible to find well-rounded professionals who know networks, applications, mobility and cloud inside and out and are able to provide recommendations in all areas. Additionally, some compliance regulations require testing to be performed by accredited security professionals and certifying an internal team will come at an additional cost. Regardless of company size or size and expertise of the security team, there are inherent benefits to getting a fresh perspective on your systems and vulnerabilities. A purely internal team that is used to the “status quo” might miss something important. Getting the maximum benefit from your vulnerability assessment involves adding context: tying the results to business impact through a comprehensive analysis of your company’s goals and vision and then applying that understanding to the outcome. The visibility into your security posture that vulnerability scanning services can provide isinvaluable. Whether there is a change to your organization’s environment, the need to prove security compliance, an initiative to transition to the cloud, or the need to handle proprietary customer information, ongoing scans can paint a picture of your security maturity and provide actionable insights for allocating resources and valuable time. AT&T Cybersecurity offers vulnerability scanning services to meet a variety of needs. Here’s a short video where you can learn more.  
Envoyé Oui
Condensat “status  a 100 ability able about accessed accredited actionable adding additional additionally ahead all allocating almost analysis any applications applying approach are areas assess assessment assessments at&t attention attractive awareness bad basis beat being benefit benefits better biggest business businesses but can can’t certifying change claim clearer cloud come companies company company’s compliance comprehensive conducting context: core cost create customer cyber cybersecurity depend detailed diagnosis difficult digital don’t due each effect effective environment equipped experience expertise exploitation exposed faces find first fix flaws focusing footprint fresh from getting goals grade guys hand handle hard health help helps here’s house impact important impossible improve increased information inherent initiative inside insight insights internal involves isinvaluable it’s its keep know lack landscape learn level maintain maturity maximum may medium meet might miss mission mobility more most motion need needs networks offer offers one ongoing operations opportunities organization organization’s organizations other out outcome overall own paint party performed perspective picture plans posture precise prioritize proactive professionals properly proprietary protected prove provide provider purely internal put quo” reactive recommendations regardless regular regulations remediation require requirement requirements requisite resources results risk risks rounded scanning scans security sense services shift short size sized skills small some something specialization stay step systems team technical testing them then third those threat through time transition treatment tying ultimately understanding used valuable variety video visibility vision vulnerabilities vulnerabilities; vulnerability well where whether who will without work your
Tags Vulnerability Threat
Stories
Notes
Move


L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.


L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.
My email: