What's new arround internet
| Src | Date (GMT) | Titre | Description | Tags | Stories | Notes |
 |
2024-07-16 07:26:11 | Acteurs de menace \\ 'Arsenal: comment les pirates ciblent les comptes cloud Threat Actors\\' Arsenal: How Hackers Target Cloud Accounts (lien direct) |
Introduction In today\'s interconnected world, cloud computing has become the backbone of countless businesses. However, with this rise in cloud adoption, malicious actors have adapted their strategies to compromise sensitive data stored in cloud environments and propagate threats throughout supply chains. One prevalent method is the use of tools specifically designed to automate attacks against cloud accounts, resulting in account takeover (ATO) and business email compromise (BEC) incidents. Keeping up with a tradition of trying to understand the attackers\' perspective, Proofpoint cloud threat researchers have obtained and analyzed various hacking tools used by threat actors. In this blog series, we\'ll showcase a few examples and explore the largely uncovered world of these tools, while examining their functionalities, the risks they pose, and how organizations can defend against them. Understanding toolsets: basic concepts and terminology Attack toolsets are purposefully crafted to enable, automate, and streamline cyber-attacks en masse. These toolsets exploit diverse weaknesses, from frequent misconfigurations to old authentication mechanisms, in order to gain access to selected resources. Often, attack toolsets are designed with specific aims in mind. In recent years, cloud accounts have become prime targets. But getting your hands on effective tools is not so trivial. Some toolsets are only sold or circulated within restricted channels, such as closed Darknet hacking forums, while others (especially older versions) are publicly available online. With a rising demand for hacking capabilities, hacking-as-a-service (HaaS) has become a prominent business model in today\'s cyber threat landscape, providing convenient access to advanced hacking capabilities in exchange for financial gain. As such, it lowers entry barriers for cybercriminals, allowing them to execute attacks with minimal effort. Regardless of their complexity, every attack tool aiming to compromise cloud accounts must utilize an initial threat vector to gain unauthorized access. Proofpoint\'s ongoing monitoring of the cloud threat landscape has led its researchers to categorize the majority of observed attacks into two primary threat vectors: brute-force attacks and precision attacks. In terms of sheer volume, brute-force attacks, encompassing techniques such as password guessing and various other methods, continue to maintain their status as the most prevalent threat vector. Despite the statistical nature of these attacks and their reliance on a "spray and pray" approach, they remain a significant threat. According to our research, roughly 20% of all organizations targeted by brute-force attacks in 2023 experienced at least one successful account compromise instance. The surprising effectiveness of brute-force methods, combined with their relative simplicity, makes this vector appealing not only to common cybercriminals, but also to sophisticated actors. In January 2024, Microsoft disclosed that it had fallen victim to a nation-state attack attributed to the Russian state-sponsored group APT29 (also known as TA421 and Midnight Blizzard). According to Microsoft\'s announcement, the attackers employed password spraying to compromise a legacy, non-production test tenant account that lacked multifactor authentication (MFA). After gaining access, attackers were able to quickly leverage it and hijack additional assets, ultimately exfiltrating sensitive data from various resources. This incident emphasizes the potential risk that brute-force and password spraying attacks pose to inadequately protected cloud environments. A brute-force attack kill chain, targeting cloud environments using leaked credentials and proxy networks. Combo lists, proxy lists and basic authentication Combo lists play a crucial role in facilitating systematic and targeted credential stuffing attacks. These lists, comprised of curated email address and password pairs, serve as the basic ammunition for most tools. Attackers leverage combo lists to automate the pr | Spam Malware Tool Threat Prediction Cloud Technical | APT 29 | |
|
2024-04-11 13:27:54 | Revisiter MACT: Applications malveillantes dans des locataires cloud crédibles Revisiting MACT: Malicious Applications in Credible Cloud Tenants (lien direct) |
For years, the Proofpoint Cloud Research team has been particularly focused on the constantly changing landscape of cloud malware threats. While precise future predictions remain elusive, a retrospective examination of 2023 enabled us to discern significant shifts and trends in threat actors\' behaviors, thereby informing our projections for the developments expected in 2024. There is no doubt that one of the major, and most concerning, trends observed in 2023 was the increased adoption of malicious and abused OAuth applications by cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors. In January, Microsoft announced they, among other organizations, were targeted by a sophisticated nation-state attack. It seems that the significant impact of this attack, which was attributed to TA421 (AKA Midnight Blizzard and APT29), largely stemmed from the strategic exploitation of pre-existing OAuth applications, coupled with the creation of new malicious applications within compromised environments. Adding to a long list of data breaches, this incident emphasizes the inherent potential risk that users and organizations face when using inadequately protected cloud environments. Expanding on early insights shared in our 2021 blog, where we first explored the emerging phenomenon of application creation attacks and armed with extensive recent discoveries, we delve into the latest developments concerning this threat in our 2024 update. In this blog, we will: Define key fundamental terms pertinent to the realm of cloud malware and OAuth threats. Examine some of the current tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) employed by threat actors as part of their account-takeover (ATO) kill chain. Provide specific IOCs related to recently detected threats and campaigns. Highlight effective strategies and solutions to help protect organizations and users against cloud malware threats. Basic terminology OAuth (Open Authorization) 2.0. OAuth is an open standard protocol that enables third-party applications to access a user\'s data without exposing credentials. It is widely used to facilitate secure authentication and authorization processes. Line-of-business (LOB) applications. LOB apps (also known as second-party apps) typically refer to applications created by a user within their cloud environment in order to support a specific purpose for the organization. Cloud malware. A term usually referring to malicious applications created, utilized and proliferated by threat actors. Malicious apps can be leveraged for various purposes, such as: mailbox access, file access, data exfiltration, internal reconnaissance, and maintaining persistent access to specific resources. MACT (Malicious Applications Created in Compromised Credible Tenants). A common technique wherein threat actors create new applications within hijacked environments, exploiting unauthorized access to compromised accounts to initiate additional attacks and establish a persistent foothold within impacted cloud tenants. Apphish. A term denoting the fusion of cloud apps-based malware with phishing tactics, mainly by utilizing OAuth 2.0 infrastructure to implement open redirection attacks. Targeted users could be taken to a designated phishing webpage upon clicking an app\'s consent link. Alternatively, redirection to a malicious webpage could follow authorizing or declining an application\'s consent request. Abused OAuth applications. Benign apps that are authorized or used by attackers, usually following a successful account takeover, to perform illegitimate activities. What we are seeing Already in 2020, we witnessed a rise in malicious OAuth applications targeting cloud users, with bad actors utilizing increasingly sophisticated methods such as application impersonation and diverse lures. In October 2022, Proofpoint researchers demonstrated how different threat actors capitalized on the global relevance of the COVID-19 pandemic to spread malware and phishing threats. Proofpoint has also seen this trend include the propagation of malicious OAuth applications seamlessly integ | Malware Threat Prediction Cloud | APT 29 | ★★★ |
 |
2023-10-23 02:22:16 | 2023 août & # 8211;Rapport de tendance des menaces sur les groupes APT 2023 Aug – Threat Trend Report on APT Groups (lien direct) |
août 2023 Problèmes majeurs sur les groupes de l'APT 1) Andariel 2) APT29 3) APT31 4) amer 5)Bronze Starlight 6) Callisto 7) Cardinbee 8) Typhoon de charbon de bois (Redhotel) 9) Terre estrie 10) Typhon de lin 11) Groundpeony 12) Chisel infâme 13) Kimsuky 14) Lazarus 15)Moustachedbouncher 16) Éléphant mystérieux (APT-K-47) 17) Nobelium (Blizzard de minuit) 18) Red Eyes (APT37) Aug_Thereat Trend Rapport sur les groupes APT
August 2023 Major Issues on APT Groups 1) Andariel 2) APT29 3) APT31 4) Bitter 5) Bronze Starlight 6) Callisto 7) Carderbee 8) Charcoal Typhoon (RedHotel) 9) Earth Estries 10) Flax Typhoon 11) GroundPeony 12) Infamous Chisel 13) Kimsuky 14) Lazarus 15) MoustachedBouncher 16) Mysterious Elephant (APT-K-47) 17) Nobelium (Midnight Blizzard) 18) Red Eyes (APT37) Aug_Threat Trend Report on APT Groups |
Threat Prediction | APT 38 APT 38 APT 37 APT 29 APT 31 | ★★★ |
|
2023-09-11 05:02:48 | Rapport de tendance des menaces sur les groupes APT & # 8211;Juillet 2023 Threat Trend Report on APT Groups – July 2023 (lien direct) |
juillet 2023 Problèmes majeurs sur les groupes APT 1) APT28 2) APT29 3) APT31 4) Camouflaged Hunter 5) Chicheur charmant 6) Gamaredon 7) Kimsuky 8) Konni 9) Lazarus 10) Mustang Panda 11) Patchwork 12) Eyes rouges 13) Pirates d'espace 14) Turla 15) ATIP_2023_JUL_JULAT RAPPORT D'APTER LE Rapport sur les APT
July 2023 Major Issues on APT Groups 1) APT28 2) APT29 3) APT31 4) Camouflaged Hunter 5) Charming Kitten 6) Gamaredon 7) Kimsuky 8) Konni 9) Lazarus 10) Mustang Panda 11) Patchwork 12) Red Eyes 13) Space Pirates 14) Turla 15) Unclassified ATIP_2023_Jul_Threat Trend Report on APT Groups |
Threat Prediction | APT 38 APT 37 APT 37 APT 35 APT 35 APT 29 APT 29 APT 28 APT 28 APT 31 | ★★ |
|
2023-07-07 02:33:29 | Rapport de tendance des menaces sur les groupes APT & # 8211;Mai 2023 Threat Trend Report on APT Groups – May 2023 (lien direct) |
Les cas de grands groupes APT pour le mai 2023 réunis à partir de documents rendus publics par des sociétés de sécurité et des institutions sont comme commesuit.& # 8211;Agrius & # 8211;Andariel & # 8211;APT28 & # 8211;APT29 & # 8211;APT-C-36 (Blind Eagle) & # 8211;Camaro Dragon & # 8211;CloudWizard & # 8211;Earth Longzhi (APT41) & # 8211;Goldenjackal & # 8211;Kimsuky & # 8211;Lazarus & # 8211;Lancefly & # 8211;Oilalpha & # 8211;Red Eyes (Apt37, Scarcruft) & # 8211;Sidecopy & # 8211;Sidewinder & # 8211;Tribu transparente (APT36) & # 8211;Volt Typhoon (Silhouette de bronze) ATIP_2023_MAY_TRADEAT Rapport sur les groupes APT_20230609
The cases of major APT groups for May 2023 gathered from materials made public by security companies and institutions are as follows. – Agrius – Andariel – APT28 – APT29 – APT-C-36 (Blind Eagle) – Camaro Dragon – CloudWizard – Earth Longzhi (APT41) – GoldenJackal – Kimsuky – Lazarus – Lancefly – OilAlpha – Red Eyes (APT37, ScarCruft) – SideCopy – SideWinder – Transparent Tribe (APT36) – Volt Typhoon (Bronze Silhouette) ATIP_2023_May_Threat Trend Report on APT Groups_20230609 |
Threat Prediction | APT 41 APT 38 APT 37 APT 37 APT 29 APT 29 APT 28 APT 28 APT 36 APT 36 Guam Guam APT-C-17 APT-C-17 GoldenJackal GoldenJackal APT-C-36 | ★★★ |
 |
2021-10-12 17:41:00 | Anomali Cyber Watch: Aerospace and Telecoms Targeted by Iranian MalKamak Group, Cozy Bear Refocuses on Cyberespionage, Wicked Panda is Traced by Malleable C2 Profiles, and More (lien direct) | The various threat intelligence stories in this iteration of the Anomali Cyber Watch discuss the following topics: APT, Data leak, Ransomware, Phishing, and Vulnerabilities. The IOCs related to these stories are attached to Anomali Cyber Watch and can be used to check your logs for potential malicious activity.
Figure 1 - IOC Summary Charts. These charts summarize the IOCs attached to this magazine and provide a glimpse of the threats discussed.
Trending Cyber News and Threat Intelligence
Russian Cyberattacks Pose Greater Risk to Governments and Other Insights from Our Annual Report
(published: October 7, 2021)
Approximately 58% of all nation-state attacks observed by Microsoft between July 2020 and June 2021 have been attributed to the Russian-sponsored threat groups, specifically to Cozy Bear (APT29, Nobelium) associated with the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR). The United States, Ukraine, and the UK were the top three targeted by them. Russian Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) actors increased their effectiveness from a 21% successful compromise rate to a 32% rate comparing year to year. They achieve it by starting an attack with supply-chain compromise, utilizing effective tools such as web shells, and increasing their skills with the cloud environment targeting. Russian APTs are increasingly targeting government agencies for intelligence gathering, which jumped from 3% of their targets a year ago to 53% – largely agencies involved in foreign policy, national security, or defense. Following Russia by the number of APT cyberattacks were North Korea (23%), Iran (11%), and China (8%).
Analyst Comment: As the collection of intrusions for potential disruption operations via critical infrastructure attacks became too risky for Russia, it refocused back to gaining access to and harvesting intelligence. The scale and growing effectiveness of the cyberespionage requires a defence-in-depth approach and tools such as Anomali Match that provide real-time forensics capability to identify potential breaches and known actor attributions.
MITRE ATT&CK: [MITRE ATT&CK] Supply Chain Compromise - T1195 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Server Software Component - T1505 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Phishing - T1566 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Brute Force - T1110
Tags: Fancy Bear, APT28, APT29, The Dukes, Strontium, Nobelium, Energetic Bear, Cozy Bear, Government, APT, Russia, SVR, China, North Korea, USA, UK, Ukraine, Iran
Ransomware in the CIS
(published: October 7, 2021)
Many prominent ransomware groups have members located in Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) - and they avoid targeting this region. Still, businesses in the CIS are under the risk of being targeted by dozens of lesser-known ransomware groups. Researchers from Kaspersky Labs have published a report detailing nine business-oriented ransomware trojans that were most active in the CIS in the first half of 2021. These ransomware families are BigBobRoss (TheDMR), Cryakl (CryLock), CryptConsole, Crysis (Dharma), Fonix (XINOF), Limbozar (VoidCrypt), Phobos (Eking), Thanos (Hakbit), and XMRLocker. The oldest, Cryakl, has been around since April 2014, and the newest, XMRLocker, was first detected in August 2020. Most of them were mainly distributed via the cracking of Remote Deskto |
Ransomware Malware Tool Threat Guideline Prediction | APT 41 APT 41 APT 39 APT 29 APT 29 APT 28 |
1
We have: 6 articles.
We have: 6 articles.
To see everything:
Our RSS (filtrered)
