This is the RSS 2.0 feed from www.secnews.physaphae.fr. IT's a simple agragated flow of multiple articles soruces. Liste of sources, can be found on www.secnews.physaphae.fr. 2024-06-02T14:15:08+00:00 www.secnews.physaphae.fr CISCO Talos - Cisco Research blog By Abhishek Singh.BEC is a multi-stage attack. Adversaries first identify targets, then they establish rapport with the victim before exploiting them for whatever their end goal is. In the case of BEC, a threat actor can impersonate any employee in the organization to trick targets.  A policy that checks for authorized email addresses of the sender can prevent BEC attacks. However, scaling the approach for every employee in a large organization is a challenge.  Building an executive profile based on email analysis using a machine learning model and scanning emails against that profile will detect BEC. Data collection for building and training machine learning algorithms can take time, though, opening a window of opportunity for threat actors to exploit.  Detection of exploitation techniques such as lookalike domains and any differences in the email addresses in the "From" and "Reply-to" fields can also detect BEC messages. However, the final verdict cannot account for the threat actor's intent.  The intent-based approach detects BEC and then classifies it into the type of scam. It catches BEC messages, irrespective of whether a threat actor is impersonating a C-level executive or any employee in an organization. Classification based on the type of scam can help identify which segment of an organization was targeted and which employees were being impersonated by the threat actor. The additional information will further assist in better designing preventive features to stop BEC. Business email compromise (BEC) is one of the most financially damaging online crimes. As per the internet crime 221 report, the total loss in 2021 due to BEC is around 2.4 billion dollars. Since 2013, BEC has resulted in a 43 billion dollars loss. The report defines BEC as a scam targeting businesses (not individuals) working with foreign suppliers and companies regularly performing wire transfer payments. Fraudsters carry out these sophisticated scams to conduct the unauthorized transfer of funds. This introduces the challenge of how to detect and block these campaigns as they continue to compromise organizations successfully. There are a variety of approaches to identifying BEC email messages, such as using policy to allow emails from authorized email addresses, detecting exploitation techniques used by threat actors, building profiles by analysis of emails, and validating against the profile to detect BEC. These approaches have a variety of limitations or shortcomings. Cisco Talos is taking a different approach and using an intent-based model to identify and block BEC messages. Before we get too deep into the intent-based model, take a deeper look at the commonly used approaches to block BEC from the simplistic through machine learning (ML) approaches. Policy-based detection The first place to start is with policy-based detection as it is one of the most common and simplistic approaches to blocking BEC campaigns. Let's start by looking at an example of a BEC email. ]]> 2022-10-18T08:41:18+00:00 http://blog.talosintelligence.com/2022/10/the-benefits-of-taking-intent-based.html www.secnews.physaphae.fr/article.php?IdArticle=7540074 False Threat,Medical,Cloud APT 38,APT 19,APT 29,APT 10,APT 37,Uber,APT 15,Yahoo None AlienVault Lab Blog - AlienVault est un acteur de defense majeur dans les IOC Kaspersky’s Global Research and Analysis Team.In the research that AlienVault and Kaspersky collaborated on, we attributed several campaigns to this actor. Armed with some of the indicators that US-CERT made public after the Sony attack, we continued to analyze different campaigns in 2015 that we suspected were being launched by the same actor. Eventually we were also able to attribute previous activity to the same attackers including:Sony Pictures Entertainment - 2014Operation DarkSeoul - 2013Operation Troy - 2013Wild Positron / Duuzer - 2015Besides several campaigns were the Lazarus group has utilized wipers to perform destructive attacks, they have also been busy using the same tools to perform data theft and cyber espionage operations.Today, as part of the Operation BlockBuster release, we want to share some of our findings and TTP’s from the Lazarus Group that allowed us to link and attribute all the campaigns and tools into the same cluster of activity. We highly recommend that you read the comprehensive report Novetta published today that includes details on the project’s scope and the more than 45 malware families identified, and includes signatures and guidance to help organizations detect and stop the group’s actions.Encryption/Shared keysOne of the key findings that gave us the opportunity to link several families to the same actors was finding a dropper that the attackers use. This dropper contains a compressed resource (ZIP) with the name “MYRES” that is protected by a password. The attackers have reused the same password in different occasions and we were able to find droppers containing different families used by the group.This actor also reuses the code libraries they utilize to perform RSA encryption. We were also able to find the exact same public key in multiple variants.Batch scriptsThis actor often uses BAT files that share the same skeleton in order to delete the initial files after infection.We have seem them reuse this technique across multiple droppers and payloads.Obfuscation functionsThe Lazarus Group uses a few different methods to obfuscate API functions and dynamically load them. One of them consist on using a simple XOR schema.]]> 2016-02-24T14:00:00+00:00 http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/140108184/0/alienvaultotx~Operation-BlockBuster-unveils-the-actors-behind-the-Sony-attacks www.secnews.physaphae.fr/article.php?IdArticle=59 False Medical APT 38,Yahoo None