One Article Review
| Source |  InformationSecurityBuzzNews |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 1084215 |
| Date de publication | 2019-03-27 21:19:02 (vue: 2019-03-27 23:01:52) |
| Titre | Second Insurer Has Cited \'War Exclusion\' To Avoid Payout Over NotPetya |
| Texte | It has been reported that a second insurer has cited ‘war exclusion’ to avoid payout over NotPetya. Multinational law firm DLA Piper is in a dispute with its insurer, Hiscox, in an echo of the Zurich Insurance refusal to pay out Mondelez – in both cases, the claims related to the NotPetya cyber-attacks with the insurers citing war exclusion clause.It claims that the NotPetya attack comes under an … The ISBuzz Post: This Post Second Insurer Has Cited ‘War Exclusion’ To Avoid Payout Over NotPetya |
| Notes | |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | ‘war appeared attacks avoid been reported that both buzz cases cited citing claims comes dispute dla echo exclusion exclusion’ exclusion clause firm first has information insurance insurer insurers isbuzz its it claims law mondelez notpetya out over over notpetya pay payout piper post post: refusal to related second security the notpetya attack the notpetya cyber the zurich under war hiscox multinational |
| Tags | |
| Stories | NotPetya |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.