One Article Review
| Source |  Network World |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 190204 |
| Date de publication | 2016-10-11 04:00:00 (vue: 2016-10-11 04:00:00) |
| Titre | A breach alone means liability |
| Texte | Rich Santalesa, a programmer turned writer and lawyer, brought an interesting turn of events to my attention last week. We need to pay heed: A litigant can have standing in a U.S. Federal breach case where no personal fraud or identity theft has yet occurred.Usually, a litigant has to have suffered injury-a breech caused them identity theft or other fraudulent activity based upon information released in a security breach. This means if you're cracked, you can be liable if personally identifiable information is released, exfiltrated, absconded, whatever. It also means that should you believe the axiom that currently most of us are hacked, we're in for a litigious treat. To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here |
| Notes | |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | absconded activity alone also are article attention axiom based believe breach breech brought can case caused click comment cracked currently events exfiltrated federal fraud fraudulent full hacked has have heed:â a here identifiable identity information injury interesting last lawyer leave liability liable litigant litigious means most need occurred other pay personal personally please programmer read released rich santalesa security should standing suffered theft them treat turn turned upon usually week whatever where writer yet you â this â to |
| Tags | |
| Stories | APT 17 |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.