One Article Review
| Source |  Schneier on Security |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 2456275 |
| Date de publication | 2021-03-09 12:16:02 (vue: 2021-03-09 13:06:02) |
| Titre | On Not Fixing Old Vulnerabilities |
| Texte | How is this even possible? …26% of companies Positive Technologies tested were vulnerable to WannaCry, which was a threat years ago, and some even vulnerable to Heartbleed. “The most frequent vulnerabilities detected during automated assessment date back to 20132017, which indicates a lack of recent software updates,” the reported stated. 26%!? One in four networks? Even if we assume that the report is self-serving to the company that wrote it, and that the statistic is not generally representative, this is still a disaster. The number should be 0%... |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | “the …26 20132017 ago assessment assume automated back companies company date detected disaster during even fixing four frequent generally heartbleed how indicates lack most networks not number old one positive possible recent report reported representative self serving should software some stated statistic technologies tested threat updates vulnerabilities vulnerable wannacry which wrote years |
| Tags | Threat |
| Stories | Wannacry |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.