One Article Review
| Source |  Network World |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 291028 |
| Date de publication | 2017-01-12 12:41:00 (vue: 2017-01-12 12:41:00) |
| Titre | Thoughts on incident response automation and orchestration |
| Texte | Just this week, I was reviewing several interviews I conducted with cybersecurity professionals on their organizations' processes and tools for incident response (IR) automation and orchestration. Here are a few things that jumped out at me:1. IR is still often anchored by basic tools, manual processes, and key personnel. While trouble ticketing and ITSM tools are pervasive and fairly mature, too many enterprise organizations still “ham and egg†it through incident response. In other words, they rely on paper forms, spreadsheets, email handoffs and some socially challenged security analyst who's really good a finding compromised systems and malicious network traffic. To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | analyst anchored are article automation basic challenged click comment compromised conducted cybersecurity egg†email enterprise fairly finding forms full good handoffs here incident interviews itsm jumped just key leave malicious manual many mature me:1 network often orchestration organizations other out paper personnel pervasive please processes professionals read really rely response reviewing security several socially some spreadsheets systems things thoughts through ticketing too tools traffic trouble week who words â ir â to â while “ham |
| Tags | |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.