One Article Review
| Source |  Network World |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 310319 |
| Date de publication | 2017-02-09 09:03:00 (vue: 2017-02-09 09:03:00) |
| Titre | As third RSA Conference without \'booth babes\' nears, no one seems to miss them |
| Texte | In March 2015, RSA Conference organizers made news by contractually insisting that vendors pitch their security wares without the help of “booth babes,†a first such ban for the technology industry.Next week's RSAC in San Francisco will be the third without the babes, so I checked in with event staff to see if the policy had evolved at all and how it has been accepted by various stake-holders.  Here's how the contract language read in 2015: All Expo staff are expected to dress in business and/or business casual attire. Exhibitors should ensure that the attire of al staff they deploy at their booth (whether the exhibitor's direct employees or their contractors) be considered appropriate in a professional environment. Attire of an overly revealing or suggestive nature is not permitted. Examples of such attire may include but are not restricted to:To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | 2015 2015: accepted all and/or appropriate are article attire babes ban been booth business but casual checked click comment conference considered contract contractors contractually deploy direct dress employees ensure environment event evolved examples exhibitor exhibitors expected expo first francisco full had has help here holders how include industry insisting language leave made march may miss nature nears news next not one organizers overly permitted pitch please policy professional read restricted revealing rsa rsac san security see seems should staff stake such suggestive technology them third to:to various vendors wares week whether will without â here †“booth |
| Tags | |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.