One Article Review
| Source |  Network World |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 316851 |
| Date de publication | 2017-02-16 08:55:00 (vue: 2017-02-16 08:55:00) |
| Titre | Microsoft\'s monthlong delay of patches may pose risks |
| Texte | Microsoft has decided to bundle its February patches together with those scheduled for March, a move that at least some security experts disagree with."I was surprised to learn that Microsoft wants to postpone by a full month," said Carsten Eiram, the chief research officer at vulnerability intelligence firm Risk Based Security, via email. "Even without knowing all the details, I find such a decision very hard to justify. They are aware of vulnerabilities in their products and have developed fixes; those should always be made available to customers in a timely fashion."Microsoft took everyone by surprise on Tuesday when it announced that this month's patches had to be delayed because of a "last minute issue" that could have had an impact on customers. The company did not initially specify for how long the patches will be postponed, which likely threw a wrench in some systems administrators' patch deployment plans.To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | administrators all always announced are article available aware based because bundle carsten chief click comment company could customers decided decision delay delayed deployment details developed did disagree eiram email even everyone experts fashion february find firm fixes; full had hard has have here how impact initially intelligence issue its justify knowing last learn least leave likely long made march may microsoft minute month monthlong move not officer patch patches plans please pose postpone postponed products read research risk risks said scheduled security should some specify such surprise surprised systems those threw timely together took tuesday very vulnerabilities vulnerability wants when which will without wrench |
| Tags | |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.