One Article Review
| Source |  Network World |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 322485 |
| Date de publication | 2017-02-24 06:03:00 (vue: 2017-02-24 06:03:00) |
| Titre | IDG Contributor Network: 3 security analytics approaches that don\'t work (but could) - Part 2 |
| Texte | A security analytics approach that exploits the unique strengths of Bayesian networks, machine learning and rules-based systems-while also compensating for or eliminating their individual weaknesses-leads to powerful solutions that are effective across a wide array of security missions. Despite the drawbacks of security analytics approaches I described in part 1 of this series, it's possible to build such solutions today, giving users a way to rapidly identify their highest-priority security threats at very large scale without being deluged with false-positive alerts or being forced to hire an army of extra analysts.To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | across alerts also analysts analytics approach approaches are army array article based bayesian being build but click comment compensating contributor could deluged described despite don drawbacks effective eliminating exploits extra false forced full giving here highest hire identify idg individual large leads learning leave machine missions network: networks part please positive possible powerful priority rapidly read rules scale security series solutions strengths such systems threats today unique users very way weaknesses wide without work |
| Tags | Guideline |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.