One Article Review
| Source |  Network World |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 323348 |
| Date de publication | 2017-02-27 05:59:00 (vue: 2017-02-27 05:59:00) |
| Titre | Microsoft\'s anti-malware program still isn\'t very good |
| Texte | In spite of a recent effort to improve the performance and detection rates in Windows Defender, Microsoft's anti-malware tool is still not very good at its job. According to the latest tests, it's downright lousy. The latest round of tests performed by German institute AV-TEST, one of the most respected and regarded malware testing shops, show that Microsoft Security Essentials and Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool fared the poorest in removing an existing infection. AV-TEST conducted a lengthy, comprehensive test over a 12-month period to determine the best malware removal solutions for Windows 10. This involved 897 individual evaluations for each product, evaluating eight security suites. To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | 897 according anti article best click comment comprehensive conducted defender detection determine downright each effort eight essentials evaluating evaluations existing fared full german good here improve individual infection institute involved isn its job latest leave lengthy lousy malicious malware microsoft month most not one over performance performed period please poorest product program rates read recent regarded removal removing respected round security shops show software solutions spite suites test testing tests tool very windows â av â the â to |
| Tags | |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.