One Article Review
| Source |  Network World |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 328414 |
| Date de publication | 2017-03-06 02:50:00 (vue: 2017-03-06 02:50:00) |
| Titre | Review: vArmour flips security on its head |
| Texte | Almost every cybersecurity program these days does some sort of scanning, sandboxing or traffic examination to look for anomalies that might indicate the presence of malware. We've even reviewed dedicated threat-hunting tools that ferret out malware that's already active inside a network. However, what if there were a different way to approach security? Instead of searching for behaviors that might indicate a threat, what if you could define everything that is allowed within a network? If every process, application and workflow needed to conduct business could be defined, then by default everything outside of those definitions could be flagged as illegal. At the very least, critical programs could be identified and all interactions with them could be tightly defined and monitored. It's a different way of looking at security, called segmentation.To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | active all allowed almost already anomalies application approach article behaviors business called click comment conduct could critical cybersecurity days dedicated default define defined definitions different does even every everything examination ferret flagged flips full head here however hunting identified illegal indicate inside instead interactions its least leave look looking malware might monitored needed network out outside please presence process program programs read review: reviewed sandboxing scanning searching security segmentation some sort that them then these those threat tightly tools traffic varmour very way what within workflow |
| Tags | |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.