One Article Review
| Source |  Network World |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 331268 |
| Date de publication | 2017-03-08 05:14:00 (vue: 2017-03-08 05:14:00) |
| Titre | What\'s the value in attack attribution? |
| Texte | For those who pursue forensic analysis with the hope of identifying and prosecuting an attacker, they likely will find that the time spent on attack attribution is fruitless.If, however, they are looking to use what they gain through attack attribution to inform their overall security procedures from prevention to response, the effort yields valuable results.Many experts in the industry have questioned whether there is any value to attribution. SafeBreach CTO & co-founder Itzik Kotler said, "The only interesting aspect in attribution itself is to classify and put information in a box and use it over and over again."Kolter offered a hypothetical in which right now CNN gets hacked by the Chinese. "That someone can or cannot attribute it to the Chinese doesn't matter. It does matter if we can say we think this is from China," Kolter said.To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | again analysis any are article aspect attack attacker attribute attribution box can cannot china chinese classify click cnn comment cto does doesn effort experts find forensic founder from fruitless full gain gets hacked have here hope however hypothetical identifying industry inform information interesting itself itzik kolter kotler leave likely looking many matter now offered only over overall please prevention procedures prosecuting pursue put questioned read response results right safebreach said say security someone spent think those through time use valuable value what whether which who will yields |
| Tags | |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.