One Article Review
| Source |  Network World |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 335073 |
| Date de publication | 2017-03-13 06:05:00 (vue: 2017-03-13 06:05:00) |
| Titre | Disaster recovery: How is your business set up to survive an outage? |
| Texte | Asynchronous vs synchronous. Dark disaster recovery vs. active architecture. Active/active vs. active/passive. No setup is objectively better or worse than another. The best one for you primarily depends on your level of tolerance for what happens when the server goes down.Security experts say how individual companies choose to save their data in anticipation of an outage depends on how long they can survive before the “lights†are turned back on. What level of availability does your company need? Is the face of your company an ecommerce site where even a few minutes offline can cost an astronomical sum? Will the cost of an active-active system outweigh the potential loss of business from an outage?To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | active active/active active/passive another anticipation architecture are article astronomical asynchronous availability back before best better business can choose click comment companies company cost dark data depends disaster does down ecommerce even experts face from full goes happens here how individual leave level long loss minutes need objectively offline one outage outweigh please potential primarily read recovery recovery: save say security server set setup site sum survive synchronous system than tolerance turned what when where will worse your “lights†|
| Tags | |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.