One Article Review

Accueil - L'article:
Source NetworkWorld.webp Network World
Identifiant 357313
Date de publication 2017-04-18 13:19:00 (vue: 2017-04-18 13:19:00)
Titre Experts contend Microsoft canceled Feb. updates to patch NSA exploits
Texte Microsoft delayed its February security update slate to finish patching critical flaws in Windows that a hacker gang tried to sell, several security experts have argued."Looks like Microsoft had been informed by 'someone,' and purposely delayed [February's] Patch Tuesday to successfully deliver MS17-010," tweeted Matt Suiche, founder of Dubai-based security firm Comae Technologies.MS17-010, one of several security bulletins Microsoft issued in March, was just one of several cited Friday by the Redmond, Wash. developer when it said it had already patched most of the vulnerabilities exploited by just-leaked hacking tools.Those tools -- 12 different Windows exploits -- had been included in a large data dump made April 14 by a hacker group dubbed Shadow Brokers, which is believed to have ties to Russia. The exploits, as well as a trove of documents, had been stolen from the National Security Agency (NSA), Shadow Brokers claimed.To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
Envoyé Oui
Condensat 010 agency already april argued article based been believed brokers bulletins canceled cited claimed click comae comment contend critical data delayed deliver developer different documents dubai dubbed dump experts exploited exploits feb february finish firm flaws founder friday from full gang group hacker hacking had have here included informed issued its just large leaked leave like looks made march matt microsoft most ms17 national nsa one patch patched patching please purposely read redmond russia said security sell several shadow slate someone stolen successfully suiche technologies those ties tools tried trove tuesday tweeted update updates vulnerabilities wash well when which windows
Tags
Stories
Notes
Move


L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.


L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.
My email: