One Article Review

Accueil - L'article:
Source itsecurityguru.webp IT Security Guru
Identifiant 374031
Date de publication 2017-06-14 09:50:08 (vue: 2017-06-14 09:50:08)
Titre Discredit a journo? Easy, that\'ll be $55k. Fix an election? Oh, I can do that for just $400k (Recyclage)
Texte Nine out of 10 consumers and banking professionals want biometric authentication put in place, but a skills gap stands in the way. Both banks and their customers favour the use of biometrics in consumer financial services, but adoption remains sluggish due in part to the lack of technical know-how within financial institutions, according to a ...
Notes
Envoyé Oui
Condensat $400k $55k according adoption appeared authentication banking banks biometric biometrics both but can consumer consumers customers discredit due easy election favour financial first fix gap guru how institutions journo just know lack nine out part place post professionals put remains security services skills sluggish stands technical that that’ll use want way within
Tags
Stories
Move


Les reprises de l'article (1):
Source itsecurityguru.webp IT Security Guru
Identifiant 374032
Date de publication 2017-06-14 09:44:52 (vue: 2017-06-14 09:44:52)
Titre Consumers \'Overwhelmingly\' Prefer Biometric Security For Financial Services
Texte Nine out of 10 consumers and banking professionals want biometric authentication put in place, but a skills gap stands in the way. Both banks and their customers favour the use of biometrics in consumer financial services, but adoption remains sluggish due in part to the lack of technical know-how within financial institutions, according to a ...
Notes
Envoyé Oui
Condensat according adoption appeared authentication banking banks biometric biometrics both but consumer consumers customers due favour financial first gap guru how institutions know lack nine out overwhelmingly part place post prefer professionals put remains security services skills sluggish stands technical use want way within
Tags
Stories
Move


L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.
My email: