One Article Review
| Source |  Schneier on Security |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 4200143 |
| Date de publication | 2022-02-28 12:26:10 (vue: 2022-02-28 13:06:08) |
| Titre | Insurance Coverage for NotPetya Losses |
| Texte | Tarah Wheeler and Josephine Wolff analyze a recent court decision that the NotPetya attacks are not considered an act of war under the wording of Merck’s insurance policy, and that the insurers must pay the $1B+ claim. Wheeler and Wolff argue that the judge “did the right thing for the wrong reasons..” |
| Notes | |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | $1b+ “did act analyze are argue attacks claim considered court coverage decision insurance insurers josephine judge losses merck’s must not notpetya pay policy reasons recent right tarah thing under war wheeler wolff wording wrong |
| Tags | |
| Stories | NotPetya NotPetya |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.