One Article Review
| Source |  SecurityWeek |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 533209 |
| Date de publication | 2018-03-21 11:29:00 (vue: 2018-03-21 11:29:00) |
| Titre | 5 Fun Facts About the 2018 Singapore Cybersecurity Statute (Recyclage) |
| Texte | An orchard of cybersecurity law is growing in Asia. Now based in Singapore, your intrepid reporter is bumping into these cyber laws not as a participant (yet) but as an interested observer. Like the data-protection laws recently passed throughout the region, these cybersecurity regulations have a lot in common with each other. Singaporeans are known for their discipline, so you can expect that their cybersecurity law will be among the best in the region. Let your intrepid reporter summarize the statute, and also highlight 5 fun facts found within it. The Singapore Cybersecurity Statute On January 8, 2018, the Singapore government published Bill No. 2/2018, referred to as “the Cybersecurity Bill.” Local infosec professionals consider it, overall, a good bill, covering exactly the topics one would expect to see from the Singaporean government. After a first draft, lively debate ensued during the public commentary period, and the government folded the best suggestions into its final bill. The administration of the statute will be completed by a Cybersecurity Commissioner. This person will define many of the finer points of policy, which have been purposely left out of the framework. The bill comprises three main themes: 1. Critical Infrastructure. The Cybersecurity Bill defines the criteria by which the commissioner should identify critical infrastructure (sections 7–9). These include 11 groupings of “essential services,” including aviation, banking, and healthcare. Fun Fact #1: The Philippine government is working on a similar project, called the “National Cybersecurity Plan 2022”, and word is that they copied the groupings, in order, from the Singaporean version. Nothing wrong with that, though. The local cybersecurity community applauds the Singapore bill's requirements for bi-annual audits and regular penetration tests. That's just good policy, so it might as well be a law; after all, this is Singapore. 2. Incident Response. Sections 19–23 define the powers the commissioner has to investigate, prevent, and respond to cybersecurity incidents. Fun Fact #2: Of interest is that the bill allows the designation of temporary technical experts, who will be issued cards identifying themselves as such. Your reporter personally finds this pretty cool, and would be tickled to be a card-carrying Singaporean crime fighter (temporarily) someday. He imagines himself holding up a badge and saying, with authority, “Everyone calm down, I'm here to help.” 3. Cybersecurity Service Providers. Sections 24–35 describe the governance of so-called cybersecurity service providers-penetration testers and security operations centers (SOCs). Perhaps the most significant aspect of the bill is Fun Fact #3: Provid |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | 2018 @dholmesf5 about april attackthreat avoid bay becoming bot: ciso columns conference crypto cyber cybersecurity david duhk facts forum fun half holmes:5 how ics industry infrastructure internet links look malware mining modeling moon news oct previous ranking reaperstack register respondstack robot roca security singapore sponsored ssl statute tags: things: usa vulnerabilities: where |
| Tags | Cloud |
| Stories | APT 37 |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
Les reprises de l'article (1):
| Source | SecurityWeek |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 528234 |
| Date de publication | 2018-03-19 10:34:04 (vue: 2018-03-19 10:34:04) |
| Titre | US Accuses Russian Government of Hacking Infrastructure (Recyclage) |
| Texte | The Russian government is behind a sustained hacking effort to take over the control systems of critical US infrastructure like nuclear power plants and water distribution, according to US cyber security investigators. A technical report released by the Department of Homeland Security on Thursday singled out Moscow as directing the ongoing effort that could give the hackers the ability to sabotage or shut down energy and other utility plants around the country. It was the first time Washington named the Russian government as behind the attacks which have been taking place for nearly three years. The allegation added to a series of accusations of political meddling and hacking against Russia that led to Washington announcing fresh sanctions against the country this week. "Since at least March 2016, Russian government cyber actors ... targeted government entities and multiple US critical infrastructure sectors, including the energy, nuclear, commercial facilities, water, aviation, and critical manufacturing sectors," the report from the DHS Computer Emergency Readiness Team said. DHS, together with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, said the Russian hackers targeted two groups -- the infrastructure operators themselves, and also peripheral "staging targets" which could be used as stepping stone into the intended targets. Staging targets included third party firms supplying services and support to the main targets but may have less secure networks. The hackers had a deep toolbox of methods to enter target systems, they said. The hacking effort paralleled Russia's alleged operation to interfere with the 2016 US presidential election and continue with online media manipulation throughout 2017. DHS did not identify specific targets which the Russians broke into. But it said they were able to monitor the behavior of control systems, install their own software, collect the credentials of authorized users, monitor communications, and create administrator accounts to run the systems. - Sustained attack - The government has been issuing warnings to operators of US infrastructure -- power producers and distributors, water systems, and others -- about foreign hacking since 2016. In January a White House report said cyberattacks cost the United States between $57 billion and $109 billion in 2016, and warned that the broader economy could be hurt if the situation worsens. It pointed the finger mainly at attackers from Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea. |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | 2018 accuses bay ciso conference cyber forum government hacking half ics industry infrastructure links moon news oct register russian scada security sponsored tags: usa |
| Tags | |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move |
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.