One Article Review
| Source |  CSO |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 5667393 |
| Date de publication | 2022-07-12 02:00:00 (vue: 2022-07-12 09:05:30) |
| Titre | Locked in: How long is too long for security vendor contracts? |
| Texte | Stephanie Benoit Kurtz thought she had a good deal when, in one of her former CISO roles, she signed a three-year contract with a vendor for vulnerability management as a service.Benoit Kurtz inked the deal thinking that her security operations program would make full use of all the offered features. But she found early into the three-year stretch that her team only used about 60% of them.She says she was in a bind: paying for a product that wasn't really the right fit with no way to get out of the contract.“It's hard to go back to the manufacturer and say, 'I didn't need that module so can I get my money back?” They don't seem to want to engage in that conversation,” says Benoit Kurtz, a former security executive who is now lead faculty for the College of Information Systems and Technology at the University of Phoenix.To read this article in full, please click here |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | about all article back benoit bind: but can ciso click college contract contracts conversation deal didn don early engage executive faculty features fit former found full get good had hard her here how in: information inked kurtz lead locked long make management manufacturer module money need now offered one only operations out paying phoenix please product program read really right roles say says security seem service she signed stephanie stretch systems team technology them thinking thought three too university use used vendor vulnerability want wasn way when who would year “it |
| Tags | Vulnerability Guideline |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.