One Article Review
| Source |  CSO |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 75198 |
| Date de publication | 2016-09-16 03:33:00 (vue: 2016-09-16 03:33:00) |
| Titre | Cyber-security VCs are holding onto their cash – but that\'s OK |
| Texte |
Cybersecurity has never been hotter. Analysts say that $3.8 billion went into cybersecurity companies in 2015, a year which saw five private companies in the market reach more than $1 billion in valuations, and others – such as Rapid7, Sophos and Mimecast -- filed for IPO.
The market's rise has been impressive – CB Insights says that last year's funding figure represented a 235 percent increase from the $1.1 billion ploughed into 166 deals in 2011. No surprise then that big firms like Intel Capital, Google Ventures and Qualcomm Ventures have become the sector's most active investors, all eyeing up the next potential unicorn.
This explosion in funding hasn't solely been confined with VCs, with the cybersecurity M&A market exploding in recent months. PwC reports that total deal activity since 2008 has exceeded $22 billion globally, with 451 Research noting that the number of security acquisitions has risen 41 percent in the last two years.To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | $22 166 2008 2011 2015 235 451 acquisitions active activity all analysts are article become been big billion but capital cash click comment companies confined cyber cybersecurity deal deals exceeded exploding explosion eyeing figure filed firms five from full funding globally google has hasn have here holding hotter impressive increase insights intel investors ipo last leave like m&a market mimecast months more most never next noting number onto others percent please ploughed potential private pwc qualcomm rapid7 reach read recent reports represented research rise risen saw say says sector security since solely sophos such surprise than that then total two unicorn valuations vcs ventures went which year years |
| Tags | |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.