One Article Review
| Source |  CSO |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 7705040 |
| Date de publication | 2022-10-27 09:32:00 (vue: 2022-10-27 17:05:54) |
| Titre | BrandPost: Top 5 Regulatory Reasons for Implementing Zero Trust |
| Texte | We are beyond the point of viewing Zero Trust as a simple marketing feature for information technology or cybersecurity companies. It is a floor for any technology vendor who wants to provide high-value solutions to government or commercial customers.Before getting into the details, let's first settle on what we mean by Zero Trust. In 2017, Forrester's Stephanie Balaouras provided what has become a common definition within the industry:“A conceptual and architectural model for how security teams should redesign networks into secure microperimeters, increase data security through obfuscation techniques, limit the risks associated with excessive user privileges, and dramatically improve security detection and response through analytics and automation.”To read this article in full, please click here |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | 2017 analytics any architectural are article associated automation balaouras become before beyond brandpost: click commercial common companies conceptual customers cybersecurity data definition details detection dramatically excessive feature first floor forrester full getting government has here high how implementing improve increase industry:“a information let limit marketing mean microperimeters model networks obfuscation please point privileges provide provided read reasons redesign regulatory response risks secure security settle should simple solutions stephanie teams techniques technology through top trust user value vendor viewing wants what who within zero ”to |
| Tags | |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.