One Article Review
| Source |  ProjectZero |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 8221927 |
| Date de publication | 2022-06-30 06:00:00 (vue: 2022-11-25 18:05:33) |
| Titre | 2022 0-day In-the-Wild Exploitation…so far |
| Texte | Posted by Maddie Stone, Google Project Zero This blog post is an overview of a talk, “ 0-day In-the-Wild Exploitation in 2022…so far”, that I gave at the FIRST conference in June 2022. The slides are available here. For the last three years, we’ve published annual year-in-review reports of 0-days found exploited in the wild. The most recent of these reports is the 2021 Year in Review report, which we published just a few months ago in April. While we plan to stick with that annual cadence, we’re publishing a little bonus report today looking at the in-the-wild 0-days detected and disclosed in the first half of 2022. As of June 15, 2022, there have been 18 0-days detected and disclosed as exploited in-the-wild in 2022. When we analyzed those 0-days, we found that at least nine of the 0-days are variants of previously patched vulnerabilities. At least half of the 0-days we’ve seen in the first six months of 2022 could have been prevented with more comprehensive patching and regression tests. On top of that, four of the 2022 0-days are variants of 2021 in-the-wild 0-days. Just 12 months from the original in-the-wild 0-day being patched, attackers came back with a variant of the original bug. Product 2022 ITW 0-day Variant Windows win32k CVE-2022-21882 CVE-2021-1732 (2021 itw) iOS IOMobileFrameBuffer CVE-2022-22587 |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | “plug 1096 1232 1364 1732 2013 2016 2020 2021 2022 2022…so 21195 21882 22587 22620 26084 26134 26925 30190 30551 30983 36942 39793* 40444 5128 cve able about access actions address addressed addressed: addresses addressing advanced again ago allows alongside already also always analyses analysis analyze analyzed analyzing annual april are around atlassian attack attacker attackers auditing automation/testing available back balances become been before being better blog bonus both bound brand breaking buffer bug bugs but cadence came can can’t case catch cause certain challenges check checking chromium closely come common compared completeness component comprehensive comprehensively concept conclusion conference confluence contained continue correct correctly could cve data day days default defenders depends detailed detect detected develop developers developing didn’t different disclosed discover does doesn’t done due each early effectively efforts elsewhere encourage ensure ensuring etc even every exactly exception execution expect explanations exploit exploitation exploitation…so exploited exploits exploits: faced failure far far” find finding findings first fix fixed fixes fixing flicking flow following force forced found four frequently from fully fuzzers gained gave at generally gift goal good google had half happen have help helps here hope hopefully how incentive incomplete independent industry interceptor interceptors internal introduced invest investment investments involve iomobileframebuffer ios isn issue issues it’s itw june just know last leads learn learning least less likely linux little looking maddie many maturity may mean method minimize minimum mitigated mitigating modifying months more most much must need new nine none not number often once one order organization original originally other others overall overflow overview own paints partnerships patch patched patching path pattern people perform performing petitpotam picture pixel plan planning plans platform play” please point post posted practically pre prevent prevented previous previously primitive prioritization process product professionals project proof property proposed protecting publish published publishing quickly rather readily recent regressed regression relate related release released reminder report report were report: reported reporter reports repository required requires requisite researchers responding responsible review root said same samples says scratch security see seen share shared sharing similar simply situation six size slides solutions some staffing/resourcing standard start stick stone structures subsystem successful surface surprise switch: take talk teams technique techniques technologically tension tests than that the following theirs them themes there’s these they’re think thoroughly those three through time times today took top transparently tries trigger types underlying understand understanding unique used users variant variants vector vendor’s vendors very vulnerabilities vulnerability we’re we’ve webkit well well:root what when whether which whole why wild will win32k windows work year years zero |
| Tags | Vulnerability Patching Guideline |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.