Source |
AlienVault Lab Blog |
Identifiant |
8373043 |
Date de publication |
2023-08-22 10:00:00 (vue: 2023-08-22 10:06:58) |
Titre |
Tirer parti de l'AT & amp; T cybersecurity Consulting pour un robuste centre d'excellence de la fiducie zéro Leveraging AT&T Cybersecurity Consulting for a robust Zero Trust Center of Excellence |
Texte |
As cybersecurity becomes increasingly complex, having a centralized team of experts driving continuous innovation and improvement in their Zero Trust journey is invaluable. A Zero Trust Center of Excellence (CoE) can serve as the hub of expertise, driving the organization\'s strategy in its focus area, standardizing best practices, fostering innovation, and providing training. It can also help organizations adapt to changes in the cybersecurity landscape, such as new regulations or technologies, ensuring they remain resilient and secure in the face of future challenges. The Zero Trust CoE also ensures that organization’s stay up-to-date with the latest security trends, technologies, and threats, while constantly applying and implementing the most effective security measures.
Zero Trust is a security concept that continues to evolve but is centered on the belief that organizations should not automatically trust anything inside or outside of their perimeters. Instead, organizations must verify and grant access to anything and everything trying to connect to their systems and data. This can be achieved through a unified strategy and approach by centralizing the organization\'s Zero Trust initiatives into a CoE. Below are some of the benefits realized through a Zero Trust CoE.
A critical aspect of managing a Zero Trust CoE effectively is the use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). KPIs are quantifiable measurements that reflect the performance of an organization in achieving its objectives. In the context of a Zero Trust CoE, KPIs can help measure the effectiveness of the organization\'s Zero Trust initiatives, providing valuable insights that can guide decision-making and strategy.
Creating a Zero Trust CoE involves identifying the key roles and responsibilities that will drive the organization\'s Zero Trust initiatives. This typically includes a leadership team, a Zero Trust architecture team, a engineering team, a policy and compliance team, an education and training team, and a research and development team. These teams will need to be organized to support the cross-functional collaboration necessary for enhancing productivity.
A Zero Trust CoE should be organized in a way that aligns with the organization\'s overall strategy and goals, while also ensuring effective collaboration and communication. AT&T Cybersecurity consultants can also provide valuable leadership and deep technical guidance for each of the teams. Below is an approach to structuring the different members of the CoE team:
Leadership team: This team is responsible for setting the strategic direction of the CoE. It typically includes senior executives and leaders from various departments, such as IT, security, and business operations.
Zero Trust architects: This individual or team is responsible for designing and implementing the Zero Trust architecture within the organization. They work closely with the leadership team to ensure that the architecture aligns with the organization\'s strategic goals.
Engineering team: This team is responsible for the technical implementation of the Zero Trust strategy. This includes network engineers, security analysts, and other IT professionals.
Policy and compliance team: This team is responsible for developing and enforcing policies related to Zero Trust. They also ensure that the organization follows compliance with relevant regulations and standards.
Education and training team: This team is responsible for educating and training staff members about Zero Trust principles and practices. They develop training materials, conduct works |
Notes |
★★★
|
Envoyé |
Oui |
Condensat |
about abreast access account achieved achieves achieving activities adapt adaptable additionally adjust ahead align aligned alignment aligns also analysts anything applying approach approaches appropriate architects: architecture are area areas aspect assessment assigned associated at&t audits automatically based become becomes been belief below benefits best between broad budget business but can capabilities capability cause center centered central centralized centralizing challenges change changes clear closely coe collaboration communicating communication complex compliance comply components concept conclusion conduct connect consolidate constantly constraints consultants consulting consuming contact context continue continues continuous continuously coordinated coordinating could create creating critical cross crucial current cyber cybersecurity data date decision deep deliverables departments depending deploy deployment design designing detailed determine develop develop: developing development developments different difficult direction distribute done down drive driving during dynamics each edge educating education effective effectively effectiveness enforce enforcing engineering engineers enhance enhancing ensure ensures ensuring environment establish evaluating evaluation everything evolve evolving example excellence executives expanding expertise experts explores face feedback finger flexible focus following: follows fostering frequently from functional future goals gradually grant guidance guide guides have having help how hub identify identifying implement implementation implementation: implementing importance important improve improvement include includes increase increasingly indicators individual information infrastructure initiation: initiatives innovation innovations inside insights instead intensive invaluable involves its journey key kpi kpis lab lag landscape latest leaders leadership least led less leveraging looking maintenance making managing manner many materials measure measurements measures members migrated monitor monitoring monitoring: more most multi must necessary need needed needs network new not number objectives offers ones ongoing only operations organization organization’s organizations organized other outside overall overcome oversight own patient percentage performance perimeters persistent perspective phased pilot plan planning: plans platform plays policies policy posture potential powerful practices present principles processes productivity professionals program project projects promotes provide providing pulse quantifiable quarterly realized reflect regular regularly regulations related relevant remain remains report require requires research resilient resistant resource resources responsibilities responsible results risk robust role roles sase scope secure security senior serve service sessions set setting should silos similar sites skills slow solution some specialized specific staff stakeholders standardizing standards starting stated stay stays strategic strategies strategy structured structuring successfully such support support: system systems taking team team: teams technical techniques technologies test these thorough threats through throughout time timelines tool tools track training training: trends trust trying types typically unified update use used user users valuable various verify vulnerabilities way well who will within without work workshops would zero ztna |
Tags |
Tool
Vulnerability
|
Stories |
|
Move |
|