One Article Review
| Source |  ProofPoint |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 8418096 |
| Date de publication | 2023-11-30 06:00:38 (vue: 2023-11-30 16:08:31) |
| Titre | L'avenir de la conformité: suivre le rythme d'un paysage en constante évolution The Future of Compliance: Keeping Pace with an Ever-Changing Landscape |
| Texte | Nothing stands still in cybersecurity-and that includes compliance. Just as new threats drive the need for new deterrents, new technologies and evolving business practices drive the need for greater oversight. Over the last few years, compliance, regulation and governance have begun evolving faster than we have seen for some time. This has been in response to rapid changes we\'ve seen ripple across industries caused by new technologies, like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, and new ways of doing business launched in response to the pandemic. In this blog, we explore what has changed within the world of compliance over the last few years and where things are likely heading. On compliance trends Like many industries, compliance and regulation tend to follow market trends. If we go back a few years, we saw a raft of privacy legislation introduced in the wake of the European Union\'s introduction of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). High profile events also tend to shift the attitudes of regulators. For example, financial services companies found themselves in the spotlight following the 2008 economic crash, while the auto industry faced similar scrutiny after the emissions scandal. During these times, regulators tend to turn their attention to enforcement, and they are willing to make an example of a company if that\'s what\'s needed to improve things. Over the years, many regulators have become much more aggressive in this area, expanding their scope and proactively applying their rules. Of course, technology drives regulatory change, too. The pandemic has recently accelerated the mass adoption of collaborative technologies and communication channels like Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Slack and many more. The availability and advancement of these channels have changed how we communicate and how we access and share data, both inside and outside of our organizations. In turn, compliance requirements have had to adapt to accommodate new ways of working. On AI and ML compliance Over the last two or three years, we have seen exciting advances in generative AI. But it has also made possible some fundamental capabilities that will become incredibly important. For example, in a world with so many claims of fake news and misrepresentation, the ability to retain immutable records is a big deal. “Immutable” effectively means that something cannot be changed and cannot be hacked. This is huge not just from a source of truth perspective but also regarding reproducibility. As we use AI tools en masse, questions will be asked about why specific systems are making certain decisions. Is AI discriminating against specific ZIP codes, for example? And if not, can those in charge of these systems prove that? In many cases, doing so will take work. AI could be better at explaining how it gets to its decisions. In order to do so, businesses will need to return to the original, immutable data. And as they become increasingly information-intensive, getting back to that source data sets a high bar of capability. AI\'s ability to process vast data sets will also raise concerns around testing. Before any organization puts a system or platform into the world, potential users want to be confident that it has been suitably tested. But even if a company spends millions of dollars testing a system, it will still sometimes fail-and errors will get through. In the past, we could accept a failure rate of, say, one in a million. But today\'s software is much more complex than anything we\'ve been able to produce in the past. So, a one-in-a-million failure rate in a system running 100, 200 or 300 million events in a day quickly adds up to widespread failures. Regulators will need to iron out how they intend to protect consumers and the markets from issues like these and set clear guidelines regarding who, ultimately, is accountable. On the future of compliance Current trends are likely to continue to drive the development of compliance management. Currently, we\'re seeing a lot of instability. While t |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | 100 200 2008 300 ability able about accelerated accept access accommodate accountable across adapt adds adoption advancement advances after against aggressive air also among any anything applying are area aren around artificial asked attention attitudes auto availability back bar become been before begun behind better big blog both business businesses but can cannot capabilities capability cases caused certain chain change changed changes changing channels charge claims clear codes collaborative common communicate communication companies company complex compliance compliance: concern concerns confident consumers continue could course covid crash current currently cybersecurity data day deal decisions designed deter deterrents development discriminating disrupt disruption doing dollars drive drives driving during economic effectively emissions enforcement ensure errors european even events ever evolving example exciting expanding expect explaining explore faced factors fail failure failures fairness fake faster financial focused follow following found freak from fundamental future gdpr general generative get gets getting global goals goes governance greater growing guidelines hacked had has have heading high how huge immutable impact important improve includes increasingly incredibly industries industry inflation information inside instability intelligence intend intensive introduced introduction iron irresponsibility issues its just keeping labor landscape last launched learn learning legislation like likely list listen long lot machine made make making management many market markets mass masse material means microsoft million millions misrepresentation more much name need needed new news not nothing one order organization organizations original otherwise out outside over oversight pace pandemic past perspective platform play podcast polarized political pollution possible potential potentially practices privacy proactively process produce profile proofpoint protect protecting protection prove puts questions quickly raft raise rapid rate recently recklessness records regarding regularly regulation regulations regulators regulatory reproducibility requirements response retain return ripple risks rules running russia saw say scandal scope scrutiny see seeing seen services set sets share shift shortages similar slack software some something sometimes source specific spends sphere spotlight stands such suitably supply system systems take taking teams technologies technology tend tested testing than that them themselves these things those threats three through time times today too tools trends truth turn two ukraine ultimately uncertainty union use users vast wake want war water ways weather what whatever where who why widespread will willing within work working world worst years zip zoom “immutable” |
| Tags | Tool Legislation |
| Stories | |
| Notes | ★★ |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.