Source |
CybeReason |
Identifiant |
8656259 |
Date de publication |
2025-03-17 14:41:45 (vue: 2025-03-17 16:08:14) |
Titre |
Suivez-vous le rythme de l'innovation de l'IA de la cybersécurité? Are you keeping pace with Cyber Security AI innovation? |
Texte |
Sautez si vous avez entendu cette histoire, mais quand j'ai commencé à antivirus chez Dr Solomon \'s, Alan Salomon partagerait comment il est passé de la recouvrement des données du disque dur en antivirus parce qu'il a reçu un volant pour récupérer et reconnu que la corruption était logique. En tant que tel, pour résoudre les dommages, il a écrit un algorithme (il était mathématicien par éducation) pour annuler la corruption. Quelques mois plus tard, il a récupéré un autre entraînement et a reconnu la même corruption logique, ce qui l'a amené à écrire un nouvel algorithme pour détecter cette corruption; C'est ainsi qu'il a commencé le logiciel antivirus du Dr Solomon. Le point ici est que l'antivirus traditionnel a toujours été basé sur la correspondance des modèles. Trouvez quelque chose d'unique à chaque attaque de son code, puis vous pouvez écrire un algorithme ou plus communément appelé ces jours-ci une signature pour détecter, bloquer et réparer l'attaque. Je me souviens qu'Alan a dit efficacement que les signatures avaient résolu le problème du virus, le volume continuerait de croître, tout comme la complexité, mais la même solution de signature s'appliquerait toujours.
Skip ahead if you have heard this story, but when I started in anti-virus at Dr Solomon\'s, Alan Solomon would share how he moved from doing hard disk data recoveries into antivirus because he received a drive to recover and recognized the corruption was logical. As such to fix the damage he wrote an algorithm (he was a mathematician by education) to undo the corruption. A few months later he was recovering another drive and recognized the same logical corruption, which led him to write a new algorithm to detect this corruption; this was how he started Dr Solomon\'s antivirus software. The point here is that traditional anti-virus has always been based on pattern matching. Find something unique to each attack in its code, then you can write an algorithm or more commonly called these days a signature to detect, block and repair the attack. I remember Alan saying effectively that signatures had solved the virus problem, the volume would continue to grow, as would the complexity, but the same signature solution would always apply. |
Notes |
★★★
|
Envoyé |
Oui |
Condensat |
ahead alan algorithm always another anti antivirus apply are attack based because been block but called can code commonly complexity continue corruption corruption; cyber damage data days detect disk doing drive each education effectively find fix from grow had hard has have heard here him how innovation its keeping later led logical matching mathematician months more moved new pace pattern point problem received recognized recover recoveries recovering remember repair same saying security share signature signatures skip software solomon solution solved something started story such then these traditional undo unique virus volume when which would write wrote |
Tags |
|
Stories |
|
Move |
|