What's new arround internet
| Src | Date (GMT) | Titre | Description | Tags | Stories | Notes |
 |
2024-07-19 12:29:14 | Comment ITDR et Deceptions peuvent se défendre contre l'exploitation des vulnérabilités logicielles How ITDR and Deceptions Can Defend Against the Exploitation of Software Vulnerabilities (lien direct) |
It seems like once or twice a year threat researchers discover a massive and often internet-exposed software vulnerability that allows cybercriminals to gain control of a vulnerable computer. Attackers can then use the computer as a foothold that leads to serious damage in a targeted organization. Do you remember Dirty COW (CVE-2016-5195), runc (CVE-2019-5736), Sudo (CVE-2019-14287), ZeroLogon (CVE-2020-1472), PwnKit (CVE-2021-4034) or Dirty Pipe (CVE-2022-0847)? Recently, regreSSHion (CVE-2024-6387) joined the list of vulnerabilities with “elegant” names and large potential impact. It was discovered and disclosed by the Qualys Threat Research Unit. RegreSSHion: a new OpenSSH software vulnerability RegreSSHion is a vulnerability in the OpenSSH security service. OpenSSH is an open-source tool that enables secure system administration, file transfers and other communication over the internet or untrusted networks. It is found in many Unix-based operating systems like Mac and Linux. Qualys states in its vulnerability disclosure blog that regreSSHion, if exploited, could lead to a full system takeover. Attackers could use the compromised system to exploit other vulnerable systems within a company, bypassing critical security mechanisms. The depth of this impact, combined with the massive breadth of its public availability, creates a global challenge. Qualys estimates that there are more than 14 million potentially vulnerable OpenSSH server instances on the internet. It also estimates that about 700,000 external internet-facing instances are vulnerable. That is a large number. So, let the patching begin, right? That way, we can all move on to the next security challenge. But wait-not so fast. Patching takes time-meanwhile, attackers can bypass security controls Even the best IT teams can take a long time to patch vulnerabilities. For some teams, the work can stretch into months, years or even longer. This extended exposure time is a serious problem. Threat actors can scan the internet to look for vulnerable systems, just like security researchers do. How can businesses protect themselves in the pre-patching phase? Should they use log-based monitoring, firewalls or agent-based EDR or XDR security systems to detect and stop intrusions? These security measures are not sufficient. Keep in mind that regreSSHion provides bad actors with root-based system privileges on the infected host. That means that they likely can turn off or bypass security controls that operate on or via the host. This is a fundamental weakness of local security controls. They are both visible and available for manipulation by malicious actors who have gained system administrative privileges. ITDR security systems, including deception-based detections, provide defense-in-depth So, what can your business do during the vulnerable period between the public announcement of a CVE, such as RegreSSHion, and when your IT teams can find and patch vulnerable systems? After all, it is during this critical time that the vulnerability is also known and findable by adversaries. This is where an ITDR solution in general and deception-based security controls in particular can come into play-and can truly shine. Signature or behavior-based detection systems need telemetry to detect a threat actor\'s presence. And they must be active to collect data and execute analysis. However, as noted earlier, once they have root system administrative privileges, attackers can, in many cases, simply disable or bypass these systems. Deceptions work differently. Tools like Proofpoint Shadow can deploy authentic-looking resources-like files, accounts and services-throughout the enterprise. These resources serve as lures for threat actors who want to use them to move laterally and escalate privileges. When they attempt to do that, a silent detection alert is triggered and forensic data is sent to the incident response team. With deceptions, there is nothing for | Tool Vulnerability Threat Patching | ||
|
2024-03-26 06:00:09 | Proofpoint Discloses Technique Pivot by Attacker Group TA577: Targeting Windows NTLM (lien direct) | Proofpoint was the first to uncover a concerning new development in the world of cyberthreats that involves a group known as TA577. These cybercriminals, which typically act as initial access brokers (IAB), have pivoted to attacking an old, but widely deployed Windows service to steal sensitive information. Specifically, they aim to steal at scale the hash of the NT LAN Manager (NTLM) authentication session details. Then it is expected that they either sell the data, or they exploit it for various downstream activities like stealing sensitive data and ransoming systems. The planned end result is the same, a significant business-impacting breach of the targeted organizations. How did the new attack happen? Proofpoint detected two distinct email-based campaigns that TA577 carried out on February 26 and 27, 2024. The campaigns targeted hundreds of businesses globally via tens of thousands of emails. The attackers cleverly disguised the emails as replies to previous emails. This is an effective social engineering tactic known as thread hijacking. The emails contained HTML attachments compressed into zip files. Each malicious attachment had its own unique identifier. And the HTML files contained within the attachment were customized for each recipient. Because all the hashes were unique, a simple signature-based detection system could not consistently detect and block these emails. When the email recipient opened the files, it triggered a connection to a Server Message Block (SMB) server that the threat actor controlled. No malware was directly delivered through these connections. However, the attackers\' objective was clear-to capture the details of the challenge/response transaction and the NTLM hashes of the user\'s Windows machine, which include the user\'s password authentication data. The attackers can use this data in the next stage of the attack either in hash form or by cracking the hash first to retrieve the password. Note: In this case, the use of multifactor authentication (MFA) would not stop the attack, as TA577 targeted previously authenticated users on active Windows machines. If targeted businesses used MFA, that authentication step would have already occurred; thus, it would not significantly hinder this attack. What was the attackers\' intent? As noted earlier, TA577 usually acts as an IAB. So, the group likely aimed to exploit the data that they collected by cracking password hashes or facilitating “pass-the-hash” attacks. They could sell access to other threat actors who seek to penetrate targeted companies\' networks more deeply. As part of our investigation, Proofpoint identified the use of a well-known toolkit, Impacket, on the SMB servers involved in the attack. This discovery further confirmed that the malicious intent behind TA577\'s activities is to go well beyond the initial account or system compromise. What is especially concerning about this attack approach is that any connection to the SMB servers would compromise sensitive information that includes: Usernames Passwords Session hashes Domain names Computer names More troubling is the fact that the attackers delivered the malicious HTML files within zip archives. That means they bypassed measures in Outlook mail clients last patched before July 2023. If your email security provider did not block the inbound email and a user engaged with the message, your last hope to avoid the compromise is the timeliness of your software patching program. The impacts on businesses This attack is based on an old protocol (NTLM) from the 1990s. But this new twist by TA577 is noteworthy because it represents a departure from the group\'s usual tactics of delivering malware and bots directly. It suggests that the group is adapting and evolving. They are seeking new ways to bypass security measures and monetize their campaigns. This cyberthreat poses a significant risk to businesses that run Microsoft Windows. Through the theft of NTLM authenti | Malware Threat Patching | ★★★ | |
|
2024-03-26 06:00:09 | ProofPoint révèle la technique PIVOT par un groupe d'attaquant TA577: Cibler Windows NTLM Proofpoint Discloses Technique Pivot by Attacker Group TA577: Targeting Windows NTLM (lien direct) |
Proofpoint was the first to uncover a concerning new development in the world of cyberthreats that involves a group known as TA577. These cybercriminals, which typically act as initial access brokers (IAB), have pivoted to attacking an old, but widely deployed Windows service to steal sensitive information. Specifically, they aim to steal at scale the hash of the NT LAN Manager (NTLM) authentication session details. Then it is expected that they either sell the data, or they exploit it for various downstream activities like stealing sensitive data and ransoming systems. The planned end result is the same, a significant business-impacting breach of the targeted organizations. How did the new attack happen? Proofpoint detected two distinct email-based campaigns that TA577 carried out on February 26 and 27, 2024. The campaigns targeted hundreds of businesses globally via tens of thousands of emails. The attackers cleverly disguised the emails as replies to previous emails. This is an effective social engineering tactic known as thread hijacking. The emails contained HTML attachments compressed into zip files. Each malicious attachment had its own unique identifier. And the HTML files contained within the attachment were customized for each recipient. Because all the hashes were unique, a simple signature-based detection system could not consistently detect and block these emails. When the email recipient opened the files, it triggered a connection to a Server Message Block (SMB) server that the threat actor controlled. No malware was directly delivered through these connections. However, the attackers\' objective was clear-to capture the details of the challenge/response transaction and the NTLM hashes of the user\'s Windows machine, which include the user\'s password authentication data. The attackers can use this data in the next stage of the attack either in hash form or by cracking the hash first to retrieve the password. Note: In this case, the use of multifactor authentication (MFA) would not stop the attack, as TA577 targeted previously authenticated users on active Windows machines. If targeted businesses used MFA, that authentication step would have already occurred; thus, it would not significantly hinder this attack. What was the attackers\' intent? As noted earlier, TA577 usually acts as an IAB. So, the group likely aimed to exploit the data that they collected by cracking password hashes or facilitating “pass-the-hash” attacks. They could sell access to other threat actors who seek to penetrate targeted companies\' networks more deeply. As part of our investigation, Proofpoint identified the use of a well-known toolkit, Impacket, on the SMB servers involved in the attack. This discovery further confirmed that the malicious intent behind TA577\'s activities is to go well beyond the initial account or system compromise. What is especially concerning about this attack approach is that any connection to the SMB servers would compromise sensitive information that includes: Usernames Passwords Session hashes Domain names Computer names More troubling is the fact that the attackers delivered the malicious HTML files within zip archives. That means they bypassed measures in Outlook mail clients last patched before July 2023. If your email security provider did not block the inbound email and a user engaged with the message, your last hope to avoid the compromise is the timeliness of your software patching program. The impacts on businesses This attack is based on an old protocol (NTLM) from the 1990s. But this new twist by TA577 is noteworthy because it represents a departure from the group\'s usual tactics of delivering malware and bots directly. It suggests that the group is adapting and evolving. They are seeking new ways to bypass security measures and monetize their campaigns. This cyberthreat poses a significant risk to businesses that run Microsoft Windows. Through the theft of NTLM authenti | Malware Threat Patching | ★★★ | |
|
2024-01-22 06:00:26 | Types de menaces et d'attaques d'identité que vous devez être consciente Types of Identity Threats and Attacks You Should Be Aware Of (lien direct) |
It\'s easy to understand why today\'s cybercriminals are so focused on exploiting identities as a key step in their attacks. Once they have access to a user\'s valid credentials, they don\'t have to worry about finding creative ways to break into an environment. They are already in. Exploiting identities requires legwork and persistence to be successful. But in many ways this tactic is simpler than exploiting technical vulnerabilities. In the long run, a focus on turning valid identities into action can save bad actors a lot of time, energy and resources. Clearly, it\'s become a favored approach for many attackers. In the past year, 84% of companies experienced an identity-related security breach. To defend against identity-based attacks, we must understand how bad actors target the authentication and authorization mechanisms that companies use to manage and control access to their resources. In this blog post, we will describe several forms of identity-based attacks and methods and offer an overview of some security controls that can help keep identity attacks at bay. Types of identity-based attacks and methods Below are eight examples of identity attacks and related strategies. This is not an exhaustive list and, of course, cybercriminals are always evolving their techniques. But this list does provide a solid overview of the most common types of identity threats. 1. Credential stuffing Credential stuffing is a type of brute-force attack. Attackers add pairs of compromised usernames and passwords to botnets that automate the process of trying to use the credentials on many different websites at the same time. The goal is to identify account combinations that work and can be reused across multiple sites. Credential stuffing is a common identity attack technique, in particular for widely used web applications. When bad actors find a winning pair, they can steal from and disrupt many places at once. Unfortunately, this strategy is highly effective because users often use the same passwords across multiple websites. 2. Password spraying Another brute-force identity attack method is password spraying. A bad actor will use this approach to attempt to gain unauthorized access to user accounts by systematically trying commonly used passwords against many usernames. Password spraying isn\'t a traditional brute-force attack where an attacker attempts to use many passwords against a single account. It is a more subtle and stealthy approach that aims to avoid account lockouts. Here\'s how this identity attack usually unfolds: The attacker gathers a list of usernames through public information sources, leaked databases, reconnaissance activities, the dark web and other means. They then select a small set of commonly used or easily guessable passwords. Next, the attacker tries each of the selected passwords against a large number of user accounts until they find success. Password spraying is designed to fly under the radar of traditional security detection systems. These systems may not flag these identity-based attacks due to the low number of failed login attempts per user. Services that do not implement account lockout policies or have weak password policies are at risk for password spraying attacks. 3. Phishing Here\'s a classic and very effective tactic that\'s been around since the mid-1990s. Attackers use social engineering and phishing to target users through email, text messages, phone calls and other forms of communication. The aim of a phishing attack is to trick users into falling for the attacker\'s desired action. That can include providing system login credentials, revealing financial data, installing malware or sharing other sensitive data. Phishing attack methods have become more sophisticated over the years, but they still rely on social engineering to be effective. 4. Social engineering Social engineering is more of an ingredient in an identity attack. It\'s all about the deception and manipulation of users, and it\'s a feature in | Malware Vulnerability Threat Patching Technical | ★★ |
1
We have: 4 articles.
We have: 4 articles.
To see everything:
Our RSS (filtrered)
