One Article Review
| Source |  UncommonSenseSecurity |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 1628786 |
| Date de publication | 2020-03-30 14:12:50 (vue: 2020-03-30 19:08:47) |
| Titre | A few more numbers, and a "that\'s interesting" or two |
| Texte | Of the 61 respondents who ID as female: 89% have a degree, 11% do not. Compared to the 359 who ID as male: 72% have a degree, 28% do not. Age/degree breakdowns: Under 26, 21 respondents, 43% no degree, 57% degree 26-35, 92 respondents, 24/76% no/yes degree 36-45, 168 respondents, 27/73% no/yes degree 46-55, 121 respondents, 26/74% no/yes degree 56 and up, 34 respondents, 24/76% no/yes degree Age/gender ID breakdown: Under 26, 21/79% ID as female/male 26-35, 22/78% female/male 36-45, 14/86% female/male 46/55, 9/91% female/male 56 and up, 15/85% female/male Of 437 respondents, 6 ID as non-binary (~1%) and 9 preferred not to answer (2%) All demographic data was clearly marked as being optional. I'll let you decide what (if any) of the revelations above warrant a "that's interesting". Up next, more-or-less cleaned up raw data files in .csv and .xlsx formats. |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | 121 14/86 15/85 168 21/79 22/78 24/76 26/74 27/73 359 437 46/55 9/91 above age/degree age/gender all answer any being binary breakdown: breakdowns: cleaned clearly compared csv data decide degree demographic female/male female: files formats have interesting less let male: marked more next no/yes non not numbers optional preferred raw respondents revelations that two under warrant what who xlsx |
| Tags | |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.