One Article Review
| Source |  AlienVault Blog |
|---|---|
| Identifiant | 2259017 |
| Date de publication | 2021-01-28 11:00:00 (vue: 2021-01-28 12:05:13) |
| Titre | Serverless computing: Is it worth the risk? |
| Texte | This blog was written by an independent guest blogger. A new trend for developers is emerging, as many companies shift towards using serverless computing. The name is a bit misleading, as serverless computing still relies on servers for storing data, but those who use serverless computing leave the maintenance of the server to their provider. They pay only for the storage needed to execute the code they develop. In this way, developers can work in a “serverless” environment that allows them to focus solely on code rather than the provisioning of the servers they use. Although this model is very cost effective and is becoming more popular, giving up control of your servers can come with security risks. This article will look at the pros and cons of serverless computing, and discuss some of the common security risks that come along with it. We’ll also go over some common problems with serverless computing and information developers need to know to make sure they aren’t victims of a security breach. The benefits of serverless computing In our digital era, people expect ease and convenience from their technology. Many internet users will abandon websites after just a few seconds if the load time isn’t optimal. The speed with which DevOps teams are expected to roll out new applications is faster than ever. In the competitive landscape of the modern world, achieving work with speed and convenience is a high priority. Serverless computing is great because it allows developers to focus solely on code instead of server maintenance. Developers don’t have to be concerned with when to patch their operating system or whether they have to change their code so that it is still functional, for example. The sole concentration is on their business applications, freeing up time to focus on what they do best. Serverless computing is also beneficial because it is highly scalable, as companies only pay for what they need. Serverless computing is also becoming more popular due to the increase in reliance on cloud applications. This has been influenced by the current redirection of business application environments to microservices and containers. Coca Cola, Netflix and Nordstrom are examples of large companies that have adopted serverless computing. With serverless computing, operational concerns are removed from the focus of the company using them. Issues with fault tolerance, scalability, availability, over/under provisioning of VM resources and other infrastructure concerns are completely the responsibility of the serverless provider. Furthermore, growing companies don’t have to keep idle servers to ensure they have room for growth. Convenience can come at a cost, however. Even though serverless computing is more affordable than having dedicated in-house servers, relying on serverless cloud computing can potentially expose your business to cyber security risks. The risks of serverless computing Using a serverless computing model doesn’t absolve developers from responsibility in regards to cyber security. The developer is still in charge of code, data application logic, and application-layer configurations while sharing responsibilities with the serverless provider. Here are some of the most common security risks that arise in |
| Envoyé | Oui |
| Condensat | “check abandon able absolve access achieving acl act adapt adopted affordable after alex allows along also although another api apis appealing application applications architecture architectures are aren’t arise arranged article attack authentication availability aws back based because becomes becoming been before beholden being beneficial benefits best bill bit blog blogger breach broken business businesses but calls can challenging change charge clear cloud coca code cola come common companies company competitive completely complicated computing computing: concentration concerned concerns conclusion configurations cons consider consume contained containers control convenience correct cost criminals critical current customize cyber danger data debugging decide decision dedicated denial dependencies deployment design develop developer developers devops difficult digital discuss does doesn’t don’t door dos due ease effective effectiveness emerging enable ensure environment environments era error errors especially essential even event ever every example examples execute executed execution exhaustion expect expected expert expose eyes fall faster fault feel financial flaws focus freeing frequently friend from function functional functions furthermore general giving going good google got great growing growth guest hackers hacks happy hardening has have having here high highly hosting house however hundred hundreds identify idle important importing increase increases independent influenced information infrastructure injection injections input insecure instead internet interpreter intruders involved isn’t issues it’s just keep know lambda landscape large layer lead leave libraries like line load logic london look loss lost made maintenance make making malicious many may means messages messages methods microservice microservices might misconfiguration misleading model modern more most move must name necessary need needed netflix new nice nordstrom not occur often one only open opens operating operation operational optimal organization organizations other others out over over/under overprotective parties party patch pay people percent” period permanently popular potential potentially prefer presents priority problems proper properly pros protect protected protection provider providers provisioning proxy public pushing quickly rather reason reasons rectify redirection regards reliance relies rely relying remote removed resource resources responsibilities responsibility result resulting reveal risk risks risky roll room run running safety says scalability scalable schemes seconds secure security sensitive separate server serverless servers service services settings sharing shift should significantly similar site situation software sole solely some source sources specific speed stack stateless storage store stored storing strong such sure surfaces syntax system target teams technology than that's them these things third thoroughly those though through time today’s tolerance towards traces transform trend trigger type unauthorized understand understanding understood untrusted unverified use users using variables variety vastly verbose very vetting victim victims vulnerabilities way we’ll web websites well what when whether which who why will williams work world worse worth written yet your |
| Tags | Guideline |
| Stories | |
| Notes | |
| Move | 
|
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris aprés sa publication.
L'article ne semble pas avoir été repris sur un précédent.