What's new arround internet
| Src | Date (GMT) | Titre | Description | Tags | Stories | Notes |
 |
2023-11-28 11:00:00 | Pour le manque de cyber ongle, le royaume est tombé For want of a cyber nail the kingdom fell (lien direct) |
An old proverb, dating to at least the 1360’s, states: "For want of a nail, the shoe was lost, for want of a shoe, the horse was lost, for want of a horse, the rider was lost, for want of a rider, the battle was lost, for want of a battle, the kingdom was lost, and all for the want of a horseshoe nail," When published in Ben Franklin’s Poor Richard’s Almanack in 1768, it was preceded by the cautionary words: “a little neglect may breed great mischief”. This simple proverb and added comment serve as emblematic examples of how seemingly inconsequential missteps or neglect can lead to sweeping, irreversible, catastrophic losses. The cascade of events resonates strongly within the increasingly complex domain of cybersecurity, in which the omission of even the most elementary precaution can result in a spiraling series of calamities. Indeed, the realm of cybersecurity is replete with elements that bear striking resemblance to the nail, shoe, horse, and rider in this proverb. Consider, for example, the ubiquitous and elementary software patch that may be considered the proverbial digital "nail." In isolation, this patch might seem trivial, but its role becomes crucial when viewed within the broader network of security measures. The 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack demonstrates the significance of such patches; an unpatched vulnerability in Microsoft Windows allowed the malware to infiltrate hundreds of thousands of computers across the globe. It wasn\'t just a single machine that was compromised due to this overlooked \'nail,\' but entire networks, echoing how a lost shoe leads to a lost horse in the proverb. This analogy further extends to the human elements of cybersecurity. Personnel tasked with maintaining an organization\'s cyber hygiene play the role of the "rider" in our metaphorical tale. However, the rider is only as effective as the horse they ride; likewise, even the most skilled IT professional cannot secure a network if the basic building blocks—the patches, firewalls, and antivirus software—resemble missing nails and shoes. Numerous reports and studies have indicated that human error constitutes one of the most common causes of data breaches, often acting as the \'rider\' who loses the \'battle\'. Once the \'battle\' of securing a particular network or system is lost, the ramifications can extend much further, jeopardizing the broader \'kingdom\' of an entire organization or, in more extreme cases, critical national infrastructure. One glaring example that serves as a cautionary tale is the Equifax data breach of 2017, wherein a failure to address a known vulnerability resulted in the personal data of 147 million Americans being compromised. Much like how the absence of a single rider can tip the scales of an entire battle, this singular oversight led to repercussions that went far beyond just the digital boundaries of Equifax, affecting millions of individuals and shaking trust in the security of financial systems. | Ransomware Data Breach Malware Vulnerability | Wannacry Wannacry Equifax Equifax | ★★ |
|
2023-08-29 10:00:00 | Lutte contre les logiciels malveillants dans la chaîne d'approvisionnement industrielle Battling malware in the industrial supply chain (lien direct) |
The content of this post is solely the responsibility of the author. AT&T does not adopt or endorse any of the views, positions, or information provided by the author in this article. Here\'s how organizations can eliminate content-based malware in ICS/OT supply chains. As the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) landscape expands, ICS and OT networks are more connected than ever to various enterprise systems and cloud services. This new level of connectivity, while offering benefits, also paves the way for targeted and supply chain attacks, making them easier to carry out and broadening their potential effects. A prominent example of supply chain vulnerability is the 2020 SolarWinds Orion breach. In this sophisticated attack: Two distinct types of malware, "Sunburst" and "Supernova," were secretly placed into an authorized software update. Over 17,000 organizations downloaded the update, and the malware managed to evade various security measures. Once activated, the malware connected to an Internet-based command and control (C2) server using what appeared to be a harmless HTTPS connection. The C2 traffic was cleverly hidden using steganography, making detection even more challenging. The threat actors then remotely controlled the malware through their C2, affecting up to 200 organizations. While this incident led to widespread IT infiltration, it did not directly affect OT systems. In contrast, other attacks have had direct impacts on OT. In 2014, a malware known as Havex was hidden in IT product downloads and used to breach IT/OT firewalls, gathering intelligence from OT networks. This demonstrated how a compromised IT product in the supply chain could lead to OT consequences. Similarly, in 2017, the NotPetya malware was concealed in a software update for a widely-used tax program in Ukraine. Though primarily affecting IT networks, the malware caused shutdowns in industrial operations, illustrating how a corrupted element in the supply chain can have far-reaching effects on both IT and OT systems. These real-world incidents emphasize the multifaceted nature of cybersecurity risks within interconnected ICS/OT systems. They serve as a prelude to a deeper exploration of specific challenges and vulnerabilities, including: Malware attacks on ICS/OT: Specific targeting of components can disrupt operations and cause physical damage. Third-party vulnerabilities: Integration of third-party systems within the supply chain can create exploitable weak points. Data integrity issues: Unauthorized data manipulation within ICS/OT systems can lead to faulty decision-making. Access control challenges: Proper identity and access management within complex environments are crucial. Compliance with best practices: Adherence to guidelines such as NIST\'s best practices is essential for resilience. Rising threats in manufacturing: Unique challenges include intellectual property theft and process disruptions. Traditional defenses are proving inadequate, and a multifaceted strategy, including technologies like Content Disarm and Reconstruction (CDR), is required to safeguard these vital systems. Supply chain defense: The power of content disarm and reconstruction Content Disarm and Reconstruction (CDR) is a cutting-edge technology. It operates on a simple, yet powerful premise based on the Zero Trust principle: all files could be malicious. What does CDR do? In the complex cybersecurity landscape, CDR stands as a unique solution, transforming the way we approach file safety. Sanitizes and rebuilds files: By treating every file as potentially harmful, CDR ensures they are safe for use while mainta | Malware Vulnerability Threat Industrial Cloud | NotPetya Wannacry Solardwinds | ★★ |
 |
2022-12-22 12:01:37 | Critical Microsoft Code-Execution Vulnerability (lien direct) | A critical code-execution vulnerability in Microsoft Windows was patched in September. It seems that researchers just realized how serious it was (and is): Like EternalBlue, CVE-2022-37958, as the latest vulnerability is tracked, allows attackers to execute malicious code with no authentication required. Also, like EternalBlue, it’s wormable, meaning that a single exploit can trigger a chain reaction of self-replicating follow-on exploits on other vulnerable systems. The wormability of EternalBlue allowed WannaCry and several other attacks to spread across the world in a matter of minutes with no user interaction required... | Vulnerability | Wannacry Wannacry | ★★★ |
 |
2022-08-24 12:34:00 | WannaCry explained: A perfect ransomware storm (lien direct) | What is WannaCry? WannaCry is a ransomware worm that spread rapidly through across a number of computer networks in May of 2017. After infecting a Windows computer, it encrypts files on the PC's hard drive, making them impossible for users to access, then demands a ransom payment in bitcoin in order to decrypt them.A number of factors made the initial spread of WannaCry particularly noteworthy: it struck a number of important and high-profile systems, including many in Britain's National Health Service; it exploited a Windows vulnerability that was suspected to have been first discovered by the United States National Security Agency; and it was tentatively linked by Symantec and other security researchers to the Lazarus Group, a cybercrime organization that may be connected to the North Korean government.To read this article in full, please click here | Ransomware Vulnerability Medical | Wannacry Wannacry APT 38 | |
 |
2021-04-27 17:24:00 | Anomali Cyber Watch: HabitsRAT Targeting Linux and Windows Servers, Lazarus Group Targetting South Korean Orgs, Multiple Zero-Days and More (lien direct) | The various threat intelligence stories in this iteration of the Anomali Cyber Watch discuss the following topics: APT, Android Malware, RATs, Phishing, QLocker Ransomware and Vulnerabilities. The IOCs related to these stories are attached to Anomali Cyber Watch and can be used to check your logs for potential malicious activity.
Figure 1 - IOC Summary Charts. These charts summarize the IOCs attached to this magazine and provide a glimpse of the threats discussed.
Trending Cyber News and Threat Intelligence
Zero-day Vulnerabilities in SonicWall Email Security Actively Exploited
(published: April 21, 2021)
US cybersecurity company SonicWall said fixes have been published to resolve three critical issues in its email security solution that are being actively exploited in the wild. The vulnerabilities are tracked as CVE-2021-20021, CVE-2021-20022, and CVE-2021-20023, impacting SonicWall ES/Hosted Email Security (HES) versions 10.0.1 and above.
Analyst Comment: The patches for these vulnerabilities have been issued and should be applied as soon as possible to avoid potential malicious behaviour. SonicWall’s security notice can be found here https://www.sonicwall.com/support/product-notification/security-notice-sonicwall-email-security-zero-day-vulnerabilities/210416112932360/. It is important that your company has patch-maintenance policies in place. Once a vulnerability has been publicly reported,, threat actors will likely attempt to incorporate the exploitation of the vulnerability into their malicious operations. Patches should be reviewed and applied as soon as possible to prevent potential malicious activity.
MITRE ATT&CK: [MITRE ATT&CK] Remote File Copy - T1105 | [MITRE ATT&CK] File and Directory Discovery - T1083
Tags: CVE-2021-20021, CVE-2021-20023, CVE-2021-20022
Massive Qlocker Ransomware Attack Uses 7zip to Encrypt QNAP Devices
(published: April 21, 2021)
The ransomware is called Qlocker and began targeting QNAP devices on April 19th, 2021. All victims are told to pay 0.01 Bitcoins, which is approximately $557.74, to get a password for their archived files. While the files are being locked, the Resource Monitor will display numerous '7z' processes which are the 7zip command-line executable.
Analyst Comment: Attackers are using legitimate tools like 7zip to evade detections by traditional antiviruses. EDR solutions can help tracking suspicious command line arguments and process creations to potentially detect such attacks. Customers should use backup solutions to be able recover encrypted files.
MITRE ATT&CK: [MITRE ATT&CK] Credentials in Files - T1081
Tags: Tor, Qlocker, CVE-2020-2509, CVE-2020-36195
Novel Email-Based Campaign Targets Bloomberg Clients with RATs
(published: April 21, 2021)
A new e-mail-based campaign by an emerging threat actor aims to spread various remote access trojans (RATs) to a very specific group of targets who use Bloomberg's industry-based services. Attacks start in the form of targeted emails to c |
Ransomware Malware Tool Vulnerability Threat Medical | Wannacry Wannacry APT 38 APT 28 | |
|
2021-03-17 18:03:00 | Anomali Cyber Watch: APT, Ransomware, Vulnerabilities and More (lien direct) | The various threat intelligence stories in this iteration of the Anomali Cyber Watch discuss the following topics: APT, AlientBot, Clast82, China, DearCry, RedXOR, and Vulnerabilities. The IOCs related to these stories are attached to Anomali Cyber Watch and can be used to check your logs for potential malicious activity.
Figure 1 - IOC Summary Charts. These charts summarize the IOCs attached to this magazine and provide a glimpse of the threats discussed.
Trending Cyber News and Threat Intelligence
Google: This Spectre proof-of-concept shows how dangerous these attacks can be
(published: March 15, 2021)
Google has released a proof of concept (PoC) code to demonstrate the practicality of Spectre side-channel attacks against a browser's JavaScript engine to leak information from its memory. Spectre targeted the process in modern CPUs called speculative execution to leak secrets such as passwords from one site to another. While the PoC demonstrates the JavaScript Spectre attack against Chrome 88's V8 JavaScript engine on an Intel Core i7-6500U CPU on Linux, Google notes it can easily be tweaked for other CPUs, browser versions and operating systems.
Analyst Comment: As the density of microchip manufacturing continues to increase, side-channel attacks are likely to be found across many architectures and are difficult (and in some cases impossible) to remediate in software. The PoC of the practicality of performing such an attack using javascript emphasises that developers of both software and hardware be aware of these types of attacks and the means by which they can be used to invalidate existing security controls.
Tags: CVE-2017-5753
Threat Assessment: DearCry Ransomware
(published: March 12, 2021)
A new ransomware strain is being used by actors to attack unpatched Microsoft Exchange servers. Microsoft released patches for four vulnerabilities that are being exploited in the wild. The initial round of attacks included installation of web shells onto affected servers that could be used to infect additional computers. While the initial attack appears to have been done by sophisticated actors, the ease and publicity around these vulnerabilities has led to a diverse group of actors all attempting to compromise these servers.
Analyst Comment: Patch and asset management are a critical and often under-resourced aspect of defense in depth. As this particular set of vulnerabilities and attacks are against locally hosted Exchange servers, organization may want to assess whether a hosted solution may make sense from a risk standpoint
MITRE ATT&CK: [MITRE ATT&CK] Data Encrypted - T1022 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Exploit Public-Facing Application - T1190 | [MITRE ATT&CK] File and Directory Discovery - T1083 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Email Collection - T1114 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Obfuscated Files or Information - T1027 | [MITRE ATT&CK] System Service Discovery - T1007 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Data Encrypted for Impact - T1486 | |
Ransomware Tool Vulnerability Threat Guideline | Wannacry APT 41 APT 34 | |
 |
2020-03-12 12:00:00 | A New Wormable Windows Vulnerability Has No Patch in Sight (lien direct) | The flaw has the potential to unleash the kind of attacks that allowed WannaCry and NotPetya to cripple business networks around the world. | Vulnerability | NotPetya Wannacry | |
|
2019-09-18 13:00:00 | Does your government take cybersecurity seriously enough? (lien direct) |
Photo by Katie Moum on Unsplash
Cybercrime is global, but the response isn’t. Governments in the west are slowly waking up to the importance of cybersecurity, and are (equally slowly) helping businesses to safeguard data and home users to protect their homes from cyberattack.
Look outside Europe and the US, though, and the picture is radically different. African countries, in particular, are underprepared for the impact of cyberattacks, and lack the governmental expertise to deal with them.
This is an issue for citizens of these countries, but also for us in the west. Poorly prepared countries act as safe havens for cybercriminals, and hackers (some of them state-sponsored) can use these countries to stage cyberattacks that directly impact users in the west.
Cybercrime: a global view
Though you wouldn’t know it from the press coverage, large cyberattacks don’t just affect the west.
Africa, for instance, actually has a huge problem with cybercrime. Recent reports from Botswana, Zimbabwe and Mozambique show that companies are increasingly falling victim to cybercrime. The global WannaCry malware attack of May 2017 hit South Africa hard, and companies in that country typically lose R36 million when they fall victim to an attack.
This situation is mirrored across the global south. It is made worse by the fact that developing nations do not have governmental policies for dealing with cyberattacks. This makes companies and home users in these countries particularly vulnerable. It also means that hackers can route their activities through these countries, which have neither the technical nor the legal expertise to catch them, let alone punish them.
Though government policies on cybercrime vary widely across the globe, many of the largest attacks of recent years rely for their success on their global reach. The Mirai Botnet, for instance, managed to infect IoT devices across a huge range of territories and countries, and this global base made it incredibly difficult to stop. Attacks like this have made the IoT one of the largest concerns among security professionals today.
Given this context, it is time for governments – in all countries and at all levels – to do more when it comes to managing cyber risk.
Managing risk
The approach that governments take to dealing with cyber risk is a critical factor in the success of these programs. Too often, governments take a ‘hands off’ approach, issuing advice to citizens and businesses about how to avoid falling victim to an attack, and then expecting them to protect themselves.
This approach i |
Malware Vulnerability Threat Guideline | Wannacry | |
 |
2019-09-10 14:57:02 | Bluekeep bug exploit published by Metasplot Project. (lien direct) | Coders late last week publicly released a working exploit for the dangerous Bluekeep bug that was found and patched earlier this year in Microsoft's Remote Desktop Protocol implementation. Designated as CVE-2019-0708, BlueKeep is a remote Windows kernel use-after-free vulnerability that could be used to create wormable attacks similar to the WannaCry ransomware incident of May 2017. Published on GitHub by […] | Vulnerability | Wannacry | |
 |
2019-07-18 17:03:01 | Over 800,000 Systems Still Vulnerable to BlueKeep Attacks (lien direct) | Users and organizations continue to patch the Windows vulnerability tracked as BlueKeep and CVE-2019-0708, but over 800,000 systems are still exposed to attacks. | Vulnerability | Wannacry | |
 |
2019-06-13 13:00:03 | May 2019\'s Most Wanted Malware: Patch Now to Avoid the BlueKeep Blues (lien direct) | In May, the most significant event in the threat landscape was not a new type of malware: it was a serious vulnerability in older versions of Windows operating systems that – if exploited by criminals – could lead to the type of mega-scale ransomware attacks we saw in 2017 with WannaCry and NotPetya. The… | Ransomware Vulnerability Threat Guideline | NotPetya Wannacry | ★★★ |
 |
2019-05-28 06:20:06 | Almost One Million Vulnerable to BlueKeep Vuln (CVE-2019-0708) (lien direct) | Microsoft announced a vulnerability in it's "Remote Desktop" product that can lead to robust, wormable exploits. I scanned the Internet to assess the danger. I find nearly 1-million devices on the public Internet that are vulnerable to the bug. That means when the worm hits, it'll likely compromise those million devices. This will likely lead to an event as damaging as WannaCry and notPetya from 2017 -- potentially worse, as hackers have since honed their skills exploiting these things for ransomware and other nastiness.To scan the Internet, I started with masscan, my Internet-scale port scanner, looking for port 3389, the one used by Remote Desktop. This takes a couple hours, and lists all the devices running Remote Desktop -- in theory.This returned 7,629,102 results (over 7-million). However, there is a lot of junk out there that'll respond on this port. Only about half are actually Remote Desktop.Masscan only finds the open ports, but is not complex enough to check for the vulnerability. Remote Desktop is a complicated protocol. A project was posted that could connect to an address and test it, to see if it was patched or vulnerable. I took that project and optimized it a bit, rdpscan, then used it to scan the results from masscan. It's a thousand times slower, but it's only scanning the results from masscan instead of the entire Internet.The table of results is as follows:1447579 UNKNOWN - receive timeout1414793 SAFE - Target appears patched1294719 UNKNOWN - connection reset by peer1235448 SAFE - CredSSP/NLA required 923671 VULNERABLE -- got appid 651545 UNKNOWN - FIN received 438480 UNKNOWN - connect timeout 105721 UNKNOWN - connect failed 9 82836 SAFE - not RDP but HTTP 24833 UNKNOWN - connection reset on connect 3098 UNKNOWN - network error 2576 UNKNOWN - connection terminatedThe various UNKNOWN things fail for various reasons. A lot of them are because the protocol isn't actually Remote Desktop and respond weirdly when we try to talk Remote Desktop. A lot of others are Windows machines, sometimes vulnerable and sometimes not, but for some reason return errors sometimes.The important results are those marked VULNERABLE. There are 923,671 vulnerable machines in this result. That means we've confirmed the vulnerability really does exist, though it's possible a small number of these are "honeypots" deliberately pretending to be vulnerable in order to monitor hacker activity on the Internet.The next result are those marked SAFE due to probably being "pached". Actually, it doesn't necessarily mean they are patched Windows boxes. They could instead be non-Windows systems that appear the same as patched Windows boxes. But either way, they are safe from this vulnerability. There are 1,414,793 of them.The next result to look at are those marked SAFE due to CredSSP/NLA failures, of which there are 1,235,448. This doesn't mean they are patched, but only that we can't exploit them. They require "network level authentication" first before we can talk Remote Desktop to them. That means we can't test whether they are patched or vulnerable -- but neither can the hackers. They may still be exploitable via an insider threat who knows a valid username/password, but they aren't exploitable by anonymous hackers or worms.The next category is marked as SAFE because they aren't Remote Desktop at all, but HTTP servers. In other words, in response to o | Ransomware Vulnerability Threat Patching Guideline | NotPetya Wannacry | |
 |
2019-05-27 16:53:02 | BlueKeep scans observed from exclusively Tor exit nodes (lien direct) | GreyNoise experts detected scans for systems vulnerable to the BlueKeep (CVE-2019-0708) vulnerability from exclusively Tor exit nodes. Microsoft Patch Tuesday updates for May 2019 address nearly 80 vulnerabilities, including an RDS vulnerability dubbed BlueKeep that can be exploited to carry out WannaCry-like attack. The issue is a remote code execution flaw in Remote Desktop Services (RDS) that it can […] | Vulnerability | Wannacry | |
|
2019-05-25 12:02:02 | 0patch issued a micropatch to address the BlueKeep flaw in always-on servers (lien direct) | 0patch, released a security patch to address the BlueKeep vulnerability, that can be deployed by administrators to protect always-on servers. Microsoft Patch Tuesday updates for May 2019 address nearly 80 vulnerabilities, including an RDS vulnerability dubbed BlueKeep that can be exploited to carry out WannaCry-like attack. The issue is a remote code execution flaw in Remote Desktop […] | Vulnerability | Wannacry | |
 |
2019-05-21 21:30:03 | Another WannaCry May Be Coming – Are You Ready? (lien direct) | The vulnerability is severe enough that Microsoft took a pretty unusual step in releasing updates for Windows XP and Server 2003 in addition to currently supported versions of Windows that are affected. Unlike WannaCry, this threat is seen as extremely easy to exploit. It took a leaked NSA tool to exploit the WannaCry vulnerability, whereas the fear … The ISBuzz Post: This Post Another WannaCry May Be Coming – Are You Ready? | Tool Vulnerability Threat | Wannacry | |
|
2019-05-16 23:13:01 | Microsoft Warns Against Critical, WannaCry-like Flaw (lien direct) | Microsoft's announcement urging users of older versions of Windows to apply a patch to protect against a potential widespread WannaCry-like attack. Two years on from the WannaCry attack, which affected computers in over 70 countries, Tanium's recent research showed that organisations are still struggling with patching hygiene, leaving their critical assets exposed. This vulnerability is so bad that #Microsoft … The ISBuzz Post: This Post Microsoft Warns Against Critical, WannaCry-like Flaw | Vulnerability Patching | Wannacry | |
|
2019-05-15 12:57:05 | Microsoft Patch Tuesday addresses dangerous RDS flaw that opens to WannaCry-like attacks (lien direct) | Microsoft Patch Tuesday updates for May 2019 address nearly 80 vulnerabilities, including an RDS flaw allowing WannaCry-Like attacks. Microsoft Patch Tuesday updates for May 2019 address nearly 80 vulnerabilities, including a Windows zero-day flaw and an RDS vulnerability that can be exploited to carry out WannaCry-like attack. The zero-day vulnerability addressed by Microsoft Patch Tuesday […] | Vulnerability | Wannacry | |
|
2019-05-15 06:06:05 | Microsoft Patches RDS Vulnerability Allowing WannaCry-Like Attacks (lien direct) | Microsoft's Patch Tuesday updates for May 2019 address nearly 80 vulnerabilities, including a zero-day and a flaw that can be exploited by malware to spread similar to the way the notorious WannaCry did back in 2017. | Malware Vulnerability | Wannacry | |
|
2019-05-14 17:11:03 | Microsoft Patches \'Wormable\' Flaw in Windows XP, 7 and Windows 2003 (lien direct) | Microsoft today is taking the unusual step of releasing security updates for unsupported but still widely-used Windows operating systems like XP and Windows 2003, citing the discovery of a "wormable" flaw that the company says could be used to fuel a fast-moving malware threat like the WannaCry ransomware attacks of 2017. The vulnerability (CVE-2019-0709) resides in the "remote desktop services" component built into supported versions of Windows, including Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2, and Windows Server 2008. It also is present in computers powered by Windows XP and Windows 2003, operating systems for which Microsoft long ago stopped shipping security updates. | Ransomware Malware Vulnerability Threat | Wannacry | |
 |
2017-06-02 08:00:00 | Les acteurs de la menace tirent parti de l'exploit éternel pour livrer des charges utiles non de la wannacry Threat actors leverage EternalBlue exploit to deliver non-WannaCry payloads (lien direct) |
L'exploit «eternalblue» ( MS017-010 ) a d'abord été utilisépar Wannacry Ransomware et Adylkuzz Cryptocurrency Miner.Maintenant, plus d'acteurs de menaces tirent parti de la vulnérabilité à MicrosoftProtocole de bloc de messages du serveur (SMB) & # 8211;Cette fois pour distribuer Backdoor.Nitol et Trojan Gh0st Rat.
Fireeye Dynamic Threat Intelligence (DTI) a historiquement observé des charges utiles similaires livrées via l'exploitation de la vulnérabilité CVE-2014-6332 ainsi que dans certaines campagnes de spam par e-mail en utilisant Commandes de versions .Plus précisément, Backdoor.Nitol a également été lié à des campagnes impliquant une exécution de code distante
The “EternalBlue” exploit (MS017-010) was initially used by WannaCry ransomware and Adylkuzz cryptocurrency miner. Now more threat actors are leveraging the vulnerability in Microsoft Server Message Block (SMB) protocol – this time to distribute Backdoor.Nitol and Trojan Gh0st RAT. FireEye Dynamic Threat Intelligence (DTI) has historically observed similar payloads delivered via exploitation of CVE-2014-6332 vulnerability as well as in some email spam campaigns using powershell commands. Specifically, Backdoor.Nitol has also been linked to campaigns involving a remote code execution |
Ransomware Spam Vulnerability Threat | Wannacry | ★★★★ |
|
2017-05-26 10:00:00 | SMB exploité: utilisation de Wannacry de "Eternalblue" SMB Exploited: WannaCry Use of "EternalBlue" (lien direct) |
Server Message Block (SMB) est le protocole de transport utilisé par les machines Windows à une grande variété de fins telles que le partage de fichiers, le partage d'imprimantes et l'accès aux services Windows distants.SMB fonctionne sur les ports TCP 139 et 445. En avril 2017, Shadow Brokers a publié une vulnérabilité SMB nommée "EternalBlue", qui faisait partie du Microsoft Security Bulletin MS17-010 .
le récent wannacry ransomware profite de cette vulnérabilité pour compromettre les machines Windows, charger les logiciels malveillants et propageraux autres machines d'un réseau.L'attaque utilise les version 1 SMB et le port TCP 445 pour se propager.
con
Server Message Block (SMB) is the transport protocol used by Windows machines for a wide variety of purposes such as file sharing, printer sharing, and access to remote Windows services. SMB operates over TCP ports 139 and 445. In April 2017, Shadow Brokers released an SMB vulnerability named “EternalBlue,” which was part of the Microsoft security bulletin MS17-010. The recent WannaCry ransomware takes advantage of this vulnerability to compromise Windows machines, load malware, and propagate to other machines in a network. The attack uses SMB version 1 and TCP port 445 to propagate. Con |
Vulnerability Technical | Wannacry | ★★★★ |
|
2017-05-23 12:30:00 | Profil de logiciel malveillant Wannacry WannaCry Malware Profile (lien direct) |
MALWARE WANNACRY (également connu sous le nom de WCRY ou WANACRYPTOR) est un ransomware d'auto-propagation (semblable à des vers) qui se propage dans les réseaux internes et sur Internet public en exploitant une vulnérabilité dans le bloc de messages du serveur de Microsoft \\ (SMB)Protocole, MS17-010.Le wannacry se compose de deux composants distincts, unqui fournit des fonctionnalités de ransomware et un composant utilisé pour la propagation, qui contient des fonctionnalités pour permettre les capacités d'exploitation des SMB.
Le malware exploite un exploit, nommé «EternalBlue», publié par les Shadow Brokers le 14 avril 2017.
le
WannaCry (also known as WCry or WanaCryptor) malware is a self-propagating (worm-like) ransomware that spreads through internal networks and over the public internet by exploiting a vulnerability in Microsoft\'s Server Message Block (SMB) protocol, MS17-010. The WannaCry malware consists of two distinct components, one that provides ransomware functionality and a component used for propagation, which contains functionality to enable SMB exploitation capabilities. The malware leverages an exploit, codenamed “EternalBlue”, that was released by the Shadow Brokers on April 14, 2017. The |
Ransomware Malware Vulnerability Technical | Wannacry | ★★★★ |
1
We have: 22 articles.
We have: 22 articles.
To see everything:
Our RSS (filtrered)
